Tools
Change country:
South Korea's New Leader Seeks EU-Style Unification With Kim Jong Un
The second phase toward joining the Koreas under the plan includes "two different systems and two different governments under the same country."
newsweek.com
'Barbie' Movie Release Date, Cast, Trailer, Plot — All We Know So Far
Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling make the perfect Barbie and Ken in Greta Gerwig's upcoming movie about the famous doll.
newsweek.com
Bella, Gigi Hadid are unrecognizable with shaved heads at Marc Jacobs show
The supermodel sisters strutted their stuff with wild undercuts, blunt-cut bangs and bleached eyebrows.
nypost.com
Путин ввел обязательную маркировку сельхозживотных
Президент РФ Владимир Путин подписал закон, направленный на улучшение учета сельхозживотных. Питомцев документ не коснулся.
http://rg.ru
'Umbrella Academy' Cast Talk Luther's Marriage, Diego Being a Dad, and More
Tom Hopper, David Castañeda, Ritu Arya and Aidan Gallagher spoke to Newsweek about the biggest "The Umbrella Academy" Season 3 spoilers.
newsweek.com
Who is Randy Cox? Outrage After Black Man Paralyzed in Police Van
Video shows Cox was paralyzed when his neck was broken inside a police van that stopped suddenly, but officers still dragged him along the ground by his arms despite his pleas for help.
newsweek.com
Lake Superior Twitter Account Slams Abortion Ban, Talks Back at Pro-Lifers
The satirical Twitter account, purporting to be written by Lake Superior, won particular praise for its response to American conservative activist Tom Fitton.
newsweek.com
101-year-old ex-Nazi guard sentenced for aiding 3,500 murders
Josef Schütz was convicted in Germany of more than 3,500 counts of accessory to murder and sentenced to five years in prison, becoming the oldest person to date to be held responsible for Nazi crimes during World War II.
nypost.com
Orca Pods Are Adopting Pilot Whales and No One Knows Why
The killer whales were spotted with a baby pilot whale, despite there being no adult pilot whales anywhere close by.
newsweek.com
Think polarization is bad now? Wait till the post-Roe abortion wars get started.
Abortion rights supporters and anti-abortion activists confront each other in front of the US Supreme Court on May 4 in Washington, DC, as demonstrations rippled across the country in reaction to the leaked initial draft majority opinion indicating the Supreme Court would overturn Roe. | Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images Dobbs is the next stress test for America’s teetering democracy. In his decision overturning Roe v. Wadeand Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Justice Samuel Alito argues that the rulings that had protected abortion rights were not only poorly reasoned but actively harmful to American democracy. “Far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division,” Alito writes in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.” There are reasons to doubt Alito’s history of the abortion wars. But, more importantly, there is no reason to believe that overturning Roe today will lower partisan tensions in the foreseeable future. As partisan divisions on abortion deepened over the years, the stakes of the issue became even higher, making each subsequent election more and more important to core Democratic and Republican voters. Abortion — and, more specifically, capturing the Court that could strike down the right to getting one — is one of the key reasons Republicans blockaded Merrick Garland, and eventually got on board with Trump despite their misgivings: He would give them the justices necessary to stop what their voters see as a modern-day Holocaust. Now, with the issue returned to state and federal legislatures, elections will actually loom larger than ever. “When it seems like the stakes can’t get any bigger, the end of Roe raises them,” says Lilliana Mason, a political scientist at Johns Hopkins University who studies polarization. Blue states and red states will soon be battling over out-of-state abortions and the national distribution of abortion pills; control over Congress and the presidency could lead to a federal law either legalizing or prohibiting abortion nationwide. The same logic that led Republicans to back an obviously undemocratic demagogue — the consequences are simply too grave for us to let the other side win — now applies on steroids to elections across the country. American democracy is already teetering on a cliff. The coming abortion wars will make it even harder for the country to step away from the brink. Asking if Roe polarized America is asking the wrong question In the six years before Roe came out in 1973, 17 states had reformed their abortion laws, with many following model legislation released by the American Law Institute, a nonpartisan organization of legal experts, in 1962. AP Anti-abortion and pro-abortion rights activists argue their viewpoints on the steps of the New Jersey State House in Trenton on April 30, 1973. That model was not exactly liberal by modern standards: It banned abortion with exceptions for rape and incest, the health of the mother, and cases where “the child would be born with grave physical or mental defect.” But it paved the way for liberalizing and modernizing abortion policy in the US. According to Mary Ziegler, a historian of abortion law at the University of California Davis, the spread of ALI-inspired bills “is what the anti-abortion movement mobilized to oppose.” The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), America’s oldest and most influential anti-abortion group, was founded in 1968 — five years before the Roe ruling. Groups like the NRLC saw the ALI bill as unacceptable, a denial of the essential personhood of the fetus, and pushed for a total ban. During this pre-Roe struggle, politicians were already trying to figure out how to take political advantage of the emerging national division on the issue. “Richard Nixon was using abortion as a wedge issue in 1972, and already experimenting with how he could polarize the debate to his advantage,” Ziegler tells me. Indeed, Republican efforts on this front yielded one of the most famous attack lines in American history — describing Democratic presidential candidate George McGovern as standing for “amnesty, abortion, and acid.” The core of the political case against Roe is that it took these trends and supercharged them: turning fights over the presidency and Supreme Court nominations into winner-take-all conflict over abortion while preventing states from experimenting with legislation that could offer a compromise way forward. Whether the abortion debate would have become so deeply polarized absent these conditions is debatable; there are plausible arguments on both sides. But today, the most important question is not historical but forward-looking: whether repealing Roe can lower the temperature of popular conflict over abortion. And it’s difficult to imagine that being the case. In Between Two Absolutes, a study of public opinion on abortion by three political scientists, the authors argue that a Supreme Court ruling in 1989 that opened a wider door to state-level regulation of abortion (Webster v. Missouri Reproductive Services) turned abortion into a more salient and divisive issue. The reason, they argue, is that elections now had much greater influence over abortion policy — giving politicians more reason to emphasize abortion on the campaign trail and voters more reason to prioritize it. An analysis by Andrew Gelman, a political statistician at Columbia University, bears this theory out. Gelman finds that there was very little partisan polarization among voters on abortion until 1992, three years after Webster and the same year as Planned Parenthood v. Casey (which reaffirmed Roe but also further opened up room for state-level regulation). State-level conflict on abortion escalated after that, most notably producing a series of pre-Dobbs restrictions in Republican-controlled states after the GOP’s dominant performance in the 2010 midterms. Jose Luis Magana/AP Anti-abortion demonstrators rally outside of the US Supreme Court in March 2020. This record suggests that giving states more discretion on abortion does not produce compromise, despite the fact that most Americans have policy preferences somewhere between anti-abortion and abortion rights extremes. Instead, it creates opportunities for state lawmakers to push for more contentious bills — leading to more partisan conflict, not less. This shouldn’t really be surprising: It speaks to the ways that abortion is both a cause and a consequence of partisan polarization. As the parties have become more clearly split on abortion, anti-abortion Democratic voters have defected to the other side (and vice versa). The American primary system incentivizes most candidates for office to cater to the dominant opinion in their party, especially in the safe seats that make up the bulk of legislative districts at the state and federal level. So the two parties’ policy positions have grown concomitantly apart: Democrats are less likely to talk about abortion as a tragedy to be minimized, and Republicans increasingly likely to support bans with few exceptions. As the stakes for abortion policy become higher, it becomes harder and harder for people who care about the issue to imagine crossing party lines for any reason. For this reason, the notion of returning to a pre-Roe abortion politics seems fanciful. Neal Devins, a law professor at William & Mary and a longtime critic of Roe’s effect on the abortion debate, conceded as much in a 2016 paper, arguing that returning abortion to the states today would be more likely to cause more conflict rather than foster a national settlement on abortion. “Today’s political dynamic is far different than the political dynamic in 1973,” he argues. “Abortion now divides the parties in ways that stand against compromise and deliberation across parties or within parties.” How Dobbs could entrench polarization Political polarization is often a vicious cycle: When parties are deeply and bitterly divided, political actors tend to take aggressive actions that lead to even more intense partisan conflict. There is every reason to expect this to be the case in post-Dobbs America, as red states enact increasingly strict abortion restrictions and blue states try to help abortion seekers circumvent them. Texas’s state law, which will go into effect soon, will ban nearly all abortions, with very narrow exceptions for maternal health. Meanwhile, the California legislature is working on a bill that would provide funding for abortion seekers from states like Texas to travel there for an abortion if it isn’t legal at home. A draft bill in Missouri would apply its own laws to out-of-state abortions by residents. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images Abortion rights activists rally outside the Planned Parenthood Reproductive Health Services Center in St. Louis, Missouri, after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24. There are also likely to be conflicts between states and the federal government. In December, the Food and Drug Administration issued a ruling allowing abortion pills to be distributed by mail — prompting Republican state lawmakers to try to figure out what could be done to restrict their spread. In a post-Dobbs world, they’ll push even further. State politics are already increasingly national, with voters caring less about politicians’ stances on local issues than their party affiliation. With one of the most divisive national issues on the ballot in every cycle, the stakes of local elections in competitive states will become even higher — making them not only more nationalized, but also sources of greater partisan strife. In deep red and blue states, candidates will have primary incentives to propose even more aggressive legislation on the issue. As a result, extreme partisanship will become even more entrenched, and the polarization feedback loop will grow stronger. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in his concurrence, signaled something almost resembling relief that the high court would be ridding itself of the abortion question and giving the abortion issue back “to the people and their elected representatives in the democratic process.” But Kavanaugh may find himself disappointed soon enough. The spread of novel state-level abortion laws will yield a tremendous number of lawsuits on largely untested legal questions — lawsuits that will eventually wend themselves toward the Supreme Court. With the Court still being a major player in the abortion wars, battles over its composition will still be (in part) proxy wars over abortion. Moreover, with Roe off the table, the battle for the White House and Congress becomes more than just a battle over who gets to appoint justices. The debate over passing a national law legalizing abortion everywhere — or prohibiting it — is already in full swing. Anti-abortion activists often compare abortion to slavery on a moral level, a comparison I fundamentally reject. But on a political level, it’s a more apt analogy: The issue is so charged, and crosses state lines so thoroughly, that political conflict over it is guaranteed to be bitter and zero-sum. One of the most important political science findings for our understanding our current era is that polarization threatens democracy by raising the stakes of elections. When voters and political leaders view their rivals as enemies, maybe even evil, and elections as existential events, the mutual toleration and forbearance at the heart of democracy wither away. Violating norms becomes imaginable; the boundaries of our politics get tested. In the Trump era, Republicans have already shown how far they’re wiling to go down this particular road. Protecting American democracy depends, at least in part, on figuring out some way to lower the stakes of partisan conflict: to make elections feel less like a zero-sum competition where one’s fundamental view of the country is on the ballot. The abortion wars heightened those stakes. Alito’s hopes to the contrary, the end of Roe won’t lead to a deescalation — and has every chance of making things worse.
vox.com
Adolescents faced obstacles getting abortions. The Supreme Court just made it harder
The legal and logistical obstacles young people face in accessing reproductive health care became more complicated with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, experts say.
npr.org
Watch: 3D View of Stinky One-Cell Ocean Organism
Jullienella foetida can reach a size of several centimeters and has a "foul-smelling odor."
newsweek.com
Как должно измениться отечественное высшее образование
Чтобы определиться с тем, как и в каком объеме готовить профессиональных историков, целесообразно обратиться к опыту предыдущих образовательных моделей, оценить их преимущества и недостатки
http://rg.ru
В Петербурге арестовали мужчину, тяжело ранившего прохожую ракетницей
В Петербурге до 28 августа арестован мужчина, который в минувшие выходные запустил ракетницу в центре города на Казанской площади.
http://rg.ru
The Arch Manning effect: Texas lands seventh big recruit since QB’s commitment
Texas is back — back on the recruiting trail, at least.
nypost.com
Scott Vermillion, Former American Soccer Pro, Had C.T.E.
Scott Vermillion, a former college star who played four seasons in M.L.S., died in 2020. He is the first American professional soccer player with a public case of C.T.E.
nytimes.com
Pharmacy sees 3,000% jump in emergency contraceptive sales
Demand for so-called morning-after pills is surging across the U.S., according to pharmacies.
cbsnews.com
WATCH: Bear surprises couple on their wedding anniversary
A couple got an unexpected surprise while celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary in Tennessee.
abcnews.go.com
'Trust Me': Wedding Planner's Hack for Cheap Seating Chart Wows Internet
"Omg thank you!" a TikToker commented on the clip. "My wedding is in July, and I needed cheap ideas."
newsweek.com
'Broke' Worker Refuses to Chip in For Boss' Maternity Gift
"My work is remote. I've only met my manager in person once at a company team day, I don't know her at all."
newsweek.com
Snakes, armadillos, porcupines and more: Airport X-ray finds 109 live animals in luggage
Chief of the wildlife checkpoint at Suvarnabhumi Airport in Thailand, said the animals were found in two suitcases following an X-ray inspection.       
usatoday.com
Комиссия правительства РФ одобрила перевод расчета пошлин на зерно и масло в рубли
В России будет скорректирована формула расчета ставок экспортных пошлин на зерновые культуры, подсолнечное масло и подсолнечный шрот
http://rg.ru
I Know the Secret to Great Sex in Your 70s. I’m Worried About My Husband’s Reaction.
I'm worried about his reaction.
slate.com
'Brave' Pet Cat Chases Black Bear Away From Owner's Driveway
"[Tigger] protected me," the cat's owner, Gavin Sturrock, told CTV News. "[Do] you think I could do that to a bear?"
newsweek.com
Photog reveals how he makes ‘wicked’ Queen Elizabeth smile in photos
Scottish-born photog Rankin snapped the sovereign for her Golden Jubilee back in 2002.
nypost.com
Border Patrol union says Biden admin ‘must accept responsibility’ after dozens of migrants killed in trailer
The National Border Patrol Council on Tuesday said that the Biden administration “must accept responsibility” for the migrants killed in a trailer in San Antonio.
foxnews.com
Trump-pardoned NYC real estate honcho donates hefty sum to Democrat Gov. Hochul ahead of primary: report
New York Democrat Gov. Kathy Hochul received a large campaign donation from a Manhattan real estate investor once pardoned by former President Donald Trump before Tuesday’s primary.
foxnews.com
Steamboats, railways and philanthropy: 'American Dynasty' traces the lives and legacy of the Vanderbilts
The new eight-part series, 'American Dynasty,' is streaming now on FOX Nation, covering the lives and legacies of eight of America's most influential families.
foxnews.com
Florida Dept of Health slams Rachel Levine for 'character assassination' over trans youth comments
The Florida Department of Health took issue with U.S. official Rachel Levine for saying "Opponents of LGBTQ equality have targeted trans and queer youth to score political points."
foxnews.com
Voters head to the polls Tuesday in first primary election since blockbuster Supreme Court abortion ruling
Voters head to polls in eight states on Tuesday for the first time since the Supreme Court’s monumental opinion overturning the landmark half century old Roe v. Wade abortion ruling
foxnews.com