Tools
Change country:

Camper in Cam Newton spat apologizes to NFL quarterback, asks for forgiveness

A young football player who was seen in a heated exchange with Cam Newton issued an apology on social media after the spat between the two went viral.
Read full article on: foxnews.com
The Best Golden Globes Memes, Including Al Pacino's Nap and That Jamie Lee Curtis Dress
The biggest issues at award ceremonies used to be falling over or reading out the wrong title for Best Picture, now we have slow Wi-Fi, lagging Zoom connections, muted audio and wardrobe quandaries to contend with.
4 m
newsweek.com
Cuomo accused of pressuring female reporter to ‘eat the whole sausage’ in ‘creepy’ video
A video showing Gov. Andrew Cuomo challenging a female journalist to “eat the whole sausage” in front of him at the 2016 New York State Fair has resurfaced on social media — amid allegations the governor sexually assaulted former staffers. “I want to see you eat the whole sausage,” the Democratic governor is heard telling...
6 m
nypost.com
The first single-dose Covid-19 vaccine is here
6 m
edition.cnn.com
Germany's Covid death toll tops 70,000
6 m
edition.cnn.com
Democrats' "Plan B" for minimum wage hike appears to be off the table
The Senate parliamentarian ruled last week a provision to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour couldn't be included in the $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package.
6 m
cbsnews.com
Mark Ruffalo's kids crash Golden Globe acceptance speech as he advocates for 'Mother Earth'
Mark Ruffalo took home his fist Golden Globes Sunday and his acceptance speech, which was crashed by his kids, is getting some attention.      
8 m
usatoday.com
Golden Globe-winner Sacha Baron Cohen mocks Rudy Giuliani, 'all-white Hollywood Foreign Press' during show
“Borat” star Sacha Baron Cohen issued some light political jabs while accepting his Golden Globes on Sunday. 
foxnews.com
Former Trump campaign communications director Murtaugh joining Heritage Foundation
Former Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh is joining the Heritage Foundation and launching his own public affairs firm, Fox News has learned. 
foxnews.com
From 'Nomadland' to Jodie Foster's upset, what those Golden Globes wins mean for Oscars
Even though the Golden Globes are known for going rogue, there are some wins from Sunday, 'Nomadland' to Jodie Foster, that might affect the Oscars.      
usatoday.com
American Express adding cell phone protection to its premium cards
American Express is adding cell phone protection as a benefit for both new and existing card members on a dozen of its premium credit cards starting on April 1.
edition.cnn.com
Michael Goodwin: Investigating Cuomo – sorry, governor, but here's why you don't get to run this probe
Months after he was hailed as a model governor and touted as presidential timber, the sudden question is whether he will survive a federal investigation into the nursing-home disaster and accusations by two former aides that Cuomo sexually harassed them.
foxnews.com
Anne Lamott reflects on the popularity of her spiritual books and how she became ‘a pretty decent writer’
Lamott’s 12th faith-based essay collection, “Dusk Night Dawn,” spins self-deprecating ruminations into manna for the majority.
washingtonpost.com
The debate over state and local aid in Biden’s stimulus bill, explained
A banner asking Congress for relief is displayed near the Capitol in Washington, DC. | Sarah Silbiger/Bloomberg via Getty Images Could some of that $350 billion be better spent elsewhere? With President Joe Biden’s Covid-19 relief package headed to the Senate, it looks like Democrats will finally get their long-held desire for hundreds of billions in unrestricted state and local government aid. So, naturally, a debate has broken out over whether they might be getting too much of a good thing — or even giving Republicans a political gift. It’s widely agreed in the party and among nonpartisan experts that some aid is necessary, with some state and local budgets in dreadful shape due to the pandemic-induced recession. But other state revenue numbers, it turns out, are significantly better than many expected several months ago. “State revenues are in most cases below where states were expecting to be before the pandemic hit,” says Kathryn White, director of budget process studies at the National Association of State Budget Officers. But, she adds, “It is true that states’ revenue projections are currently in many cases not as dire as they were expecting last spring.” States had expected a fiscal catastrophe similar to the Great Recession of 2008-2009, but the current situation is different, with higher-income workers hit less hard and stocks performing well. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images The New York Stock Exchange on Wall Street on February 17. There have been questions about whether this money could be better spent on other matters, whether it’s wasteful — and whether it means handing many Republican governors large amounts of money that they will then use to fund big tax cuts skewed toward the rich. A bill like this stimulus is similar to a moving train. Many decisions about it were made at the top some time ago, and changing them could be difficult at this point. The topline number for unrestricted aid, $350 billion, was set in Biden’s proposal in mid-January. House Democrats’ energy was focused on getting the votes to pass the bill they have, not rethinking whether they should do less. But now moderate senators will have their say. And it’s not just the usual suspects like Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) who have doubts about this provision — Sens. Angus King (I-ME) and Mark Warner (D-VA) want to make changes to it too, the Washington Post’s Erica Werner, Jeff Stein, and Seung Min Kim report. So the final shape of unrestricted aid in the stimulus remains very much in the air. Democrats have wanted this aid money for nearly a year Of the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill passed by the House early Saturday morning, $350 billion is reserved for unrestricted aid for states, local governments, tribes, and territories. Importantly, this is not the only money in the stimulus going to state and local government entities — there are hundreds of billions more for public school reopenings, pandemic response expenses like vaccinations, transit, child care assistance programs, help for renters and homeowners, and small businesses, as Vox’s Emily Stewart explains. Last year’s stimulus bills devoted money toward some of these priorities as well. But the political battles over the unrestricted aid have been fiercest, precisely because there are no strings attached. Indeed, there has not been a single dollar of such unrestricted aid signed into law yet — Republicans balked at including any in the 2020 relief legislation, with then-President Trump disparaging it as “bailout money.” Democrats, though, have argued since last spring that more flexible state and local aid was badly needed. These governments were seeing revenues plummet due to a catastrophe not of their making — the public health emergency and the associated disruption to the economy — and they cannot run deficits like the federal government can. So to prevent devastating service cutbacks or layoffs, large amounts of unrestricted aid would be necessary, the argument went. Now that Biden is president and Democrats control the Senate, they finally have the power to achieve this longtime goal. The $350 billion included in the stimulus bill that passed the House is divided in the following way: State governments and Washington, DC — $195.3 billion: Each state (and DC) would get $500 million, and the remaining $169 billion is divided up according to each state’s share of national unemployed workers. DC’s government would also get $755 million that Democrats say it should have gotten in last year’s stimulus (Republicans insisted then on treating DC like a territory, not a state). Local governments — $130.2 billion: Half of this goes to cities and half to counties. The city money would be divided according to a community development block grant formula, and the county money would be given out according to population. The House bill also contains $20 billion given to federally recognized tribal governments and $4.5 billion to US territories. But keep in mind that none of this is final. All of these details are subject to change as the bill moves to the Senate. States’ current budget situation is more complicated than was expected Republican officeholders’ objections to the very concept of unrestricted state and local aid money have been based on politics, not economics. Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, has called the state and local aid money “the best thing” in Biden’s proposal. “Until state and local governments receive relief, this will act as a drag on the recovery and prolong the period of economic weakness,” Strain said in January. But there has been some recent chatter in the policymaking world about whether the particular amount of money Democrats are devoting to aid in this bill still makes sense, given recent better-than-expected revenue numbers from many states. Slate’s Jordan Weissmann summed up the state of affairs earlier this month in an article headlined “Biden Wants to Give States $350 Billion. Do They Still Need It?” Remember, the national political debate over state and local aid began last year, when many feared another Great Recession was about to unfold. Based on early indicators, and what happened last time, state fiscal forecasts were dire. David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images Of the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill passed by the House, $350 billion is reserved for unrestricted aid for states, local governments, tribes, and territories. It turned out, however, that the Covid-19 recession was not a mirror image of the Great Recession. This time around, the impact fell disproportionately on low-income workers; high-income earners were relatively insulated, meaning income tax revenue has stayed strong. Other facts include the strong stock market and the previous federal stimulus packages. “Revenues have performed a lot better than was feared,” says Lucy Dadayan, a senior research associate at the Urban Institute. Instead of a universal collapse, 28 states saw revenue declines from April to December 2020 compared with the same period in 2019, per an Urban Institute analysis. The remaining 22 states saw revenue increases compared to the previous year — though not as much as had been expected. “Revenues are still substantially down compared to what they would have been if there was no pandemic,” Dadayan says. And expenses may be up, also due to the pandemic, though that’s tougher to track at the moment. Still, there have been headlines about certain states being “surprisingly flush with cash” (New Jersey) or bringing in “record revenues” (California). But the Urban Institute analysis also makes clear there are states that have absolutely been hammered. In contrast to Republicans’ claims of a “blue state bailout,” those that have seen the most dire revenue collapses are a mix of blue (Hawaii, Oregon, and Delaware), red (Alaska, North Dakota, Texas, Wyoming, and Louisiana), and purple (Nevada and Florida). Some of these states have been hit hard by the collapse of tourism, some by the collapse in oil prices, and others because they rely on sales taxes rather than income taxes for revenue. It’s tougher to get a sense of what’s happening with local governments since the data is too disparate. But overall, some states are really hurting badly, others could use some help, and some appear to be doing surprisingly well. The bill could still change in the Senate — if moderates want it to change Considering the recent information on state finances, there has been some second-guessing on whether the $350 billion allotted for state and local aid in the bill is too much. (Though it’s less than one-fifth of Biden’s $1.9 trillion stimulus, $350 billion is still a massive sum — Obama’s entire stimulus package in 2009 was $787 billion.) There are several possible criticisms of the current allotment. From a progressive point of view, if states’ need is less than expected, much of this money might be better redirected toward people who need it more. Or, from a deficit hawk’s point of view, maybe the money shouldn’t be spent at all. Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks to reporters on specific components of President Biden’s $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief plan on February 11. “These excessive funds will unnecessarily add to the federal debt or crowd out other priorities (such as continuing emergency unemployment benefits beyond August),” the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget argues. “They could also lead many states to enact damaging tax cuts or spending programs that ultimately undermine their long-term finances.” The more politically minded also wonder about the wisdom of handing many Republican governors large sacks of money, which they could theoretically use for big permanent tax cuts skewed toward wealthy earners. (That’s the nature of unrestricted aid — it’s unrestricted!) Of course, there’s still time for the bill to change — and now that it’s in the Senate, moderate Democrats may flex their muscles and force those changes. In an interview, a Democratic Senate aide emphasized to me that the upper chamber’s wrangling over the bill was just beginning. The aide mentioned several possibilities for how the state and local aid money could be tweaked going forward, depending on what moderate Democrats want: The overall topline number of $350 billion could be cut. There could be new restrictions laying out how the aid money can’t used — for instance, that it couldn’t be used for permanent tax cuts (though this could run afoul of the infamous Byrd Rule that governs what’s acceptable under the Senate’s budget reconciliation process). There may also be specifications on how some of the money must be used (according to the Washington Post, there’s talk of redirecting some of it to broadband investment) The distribution of the money could be staggered over a longer time, so states could certify if they still need it later on (“that’s something we’re actively looking at,” the Senate aide said). Overall, though, congressional Democrats haven’t been particularly swayed by the arguments that they should drastically rethink the state aid money. And the reason for that is the ghost of 2009. “Last time around, a lot of Democratic lawmakers, both in the White House and Congress, were stung by the reality that we did way too little,” the aide says. “So if anything, I think folks want to err on the side of something bigger.”
vox.com
Stimulus negotiations: Pressure turns to the Senate to close deal on Covid relief
The Senate could move as soon as this week to pass their own version of President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion Covid relief bill.
edition.cnn.com
Top NFL Draft prospect was driving for DoorDash before start of 2020 season: report
BYU star Zach Wilson could be one of the first quarterbacks off the board during the upcoming NFL Draft in the spring and a recent anecdote revealed the trials and tribulations of his 2020 offseason.
foxnews.com
ShowBiz Minute: Globes Winners, Globes Fashion, Prince Harry
"Nomadland" and "Borat Subsequent Moviefilm" win big at the virtual Golden Globe Awards; Amanda Seyfried and Jason Sudeikis' Golden Globe fashion moments; Prince Harry says separating from royal life has been "unbelievably tough" for him and wife, Meghan. (March 1)      
usatoday.com
Prince Philip transferred to another hospital to continue treatment
Per the palace, Philip, 99, was transferred from King Edward VII’s Hospital to St Bartholomew’s Hospital.
foxnews.com
Judge Esther Salas Returns to Work After Son Killed At Home, Her Safety Warning Unheeded
Salas has been calling for more privacy and protections for judges after the shooting at her New Jersey home last July.
newsweek.com
Governors' Long Honeymoon of COVID Approval Ratings Is Coming to an End
Democrats and Republican governors of blue states appear to have benefited more from their handling of the virus.
newsweek.com
Netflix Golden Globes 2021 Winners and Nominations List
When it comes to the 2021 Golden Globes, Netflix wears the crown.
nypost.com
3 names mysteriously removed from Khashoggi Intel report
CNN's Alex Marquardt reports that three names were removed from a US intelligence report on the death of journalist Jamal Khashoggi without explanation.
edition.cnn.com
Amazon Prime Video Golden Globes 2021 Winners and Nominations List
Check out Sacha Baron Cohen and John Boyega's Golden Globe-winning performances on Amazon Prime Video.
nypost.com
Defying deadly crackdown, crowds again protest Myanmar coup
Police in Myanmar’s biggest city have fired tear gas at defiant crowds who returned to the streets to protest last month’s coup
abcnews.go.com
Prince Philip transferred to a London hospital for infection treatment
Buckingham Palace says Prince Philip has been transferred to another hospital.
abcnews.go.com
Joaquin Castro Says Latinos 'Almost Completely Missing' From Golden Globes
Texas congressman Joaquin Castro slammed the Golden Globes for its lack of Latino nominees amid criticism surrounding Hollywood's diversity problem.
newsweek.com
Prince Philip moved to new hospital to treat infection and test preexisting heart condition
Britain's Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth II, was moved from one London hospital to another on Monday for treatment of an infection and observation of a preexisting heart condition, Buckingham Palace announced.
edition.cnn.com
Prince Philip moved to new hospital to treat infection and test preexisting heart condition
Britain's Prince Philip, the husband of Queen Elizabeth II, was moved from one London hospital to another on Monday for treatment of an infection and observation of a preexisting heart condition, Buckingham Palace announced.
edition.cnn.com
Justice for Jamal Khashoggi is up to all of us
Respectful, forceful questions meet skilled, honest spokeswomen
washingtonpost.com
Jason Bateman filmed Golden Globes 2021 appearance at Jennifer Aniston’s house
That's what friends are for.
nypost.com
Pet-friendly stays: These Airbnbs were wishlisted the most for traveling with your pooch
Airbnb compiled a list of the most wishlisted, pet-friendly stays around the world.      
usatoday.com
Warren Buffett sees shades of 1980s crisis in today's bond market
Warren Buffett is warning that the "pathetic" returns available to bond investors may encourage risky behavior. 
edition.cnn.com
Warren Buffett sees shades of 1980s crisis in today's bond market
Warren Buffett is warning that the "pathetic" returns available to bond investors may encourage risky behavior.
edition.cnn.com
PS5 Restock Updates for GameStop, Antonline, Target, Walmart and More
Find out what the latest PlayStation 5 stock situation is at major retailers following numerous restocks in February.
newsweek.com
Journalist discusses messages between Gov. Cuomo and accuser
Jesse McKinley, Albany bureau chief at The New York Times, speaks about the second accusation of sexual harassment against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the texts and emails shared between Cuomo and his accuser, Charlotte Bennett.
edition.cnn.com
9-year-old girl dies after being caned during "exorcism"
The two suspects - the woman performing the exorcism and the girl's mother - were arrested.
cbsnews.com
The Health 202: It's like the Obamacare repeal-and-replace fight all over again
Except this time, it's Democrats who are using budget reconciliation to pass health insurance measures.
washingtonpost.com
2021 Big South Conference men's basketball tournament: Matchups, players to know & more
The 2021 Big South Conference men’s basketball tournament will determine which team gets an automatic bid to the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament.
foxnews.com
Where to Watch Golden Globe 2021 Nominated Movies and Shows
Here's how to watch the best of the best from the 2021 Golden Globes!
nypost.com
Elliott: Clippers remind us why their championship hopes once again could collapse
The Clippers are capable of beating the NBA's best teams, but against Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks they showed some of their weaknesses.
latimes.com
Cage Warriors 121: Unbeaten bantamweight champion Jack Cartwright to face Sylwester Miller
Undefeated bantamweight champion Jack Cartwright will bid to register his third successful title defense at Cage Warriors 121 in London.       Related StoriesCage Warriors 121: Unbeaten bantamweight champion Jack Cartwright to face Sylwester Miller - EnclosureMMA's week out of the cage: Max Holloway promoted to jiu-jitsu brown beltSkid over, Alexis Davis 'can breathe again' and is ready for next level 
usatoday.com
Biden Administration China Ties Reveal a Deeper Disturbing Truth | Opinion
The U.S. has helped create its most formidable adversary.
newsweek.com
Online Communities Matter. Especially for the Chronically Ill | Opinion
According to the CDC, six in 10 Americans have a chronic illness.
newsweek.com
The Republican revolt against democracy, explained in 13 charts
A visitor wears a face mask with a picture of former President Donald Trump’s mouth on it during the Conservative Political Action Conference on February 26, 2021, in Orlando, Florida. | Joe Raedle/Getty Images The Trump years revealed a dark truth: The Republican Party is no longer committed to democracy. These charts tell the story. The Republican Party is the biggest threat to American democracy today. It is a radical, obstructionist faction that has become hostile to the most basic democratic norm: that the other side should get to wield power when it wins elections. A few years ago, these statements may have sounded like partisan Democratic hyperbole. But in the wake of the January 6 attack on the Capitol and Trump’s acquittal in the Senate on the charge of inciting it, they seem more a plain description of where we’re at as a country. But how deep does the GOP’s problem with democracy run, really? How did things get so bad? And is it likely to get worse? Below are 13 charts that illustrate the depth of the problem and how we got here. The story they tell is sobering: At every level, from the elite down to rank-and-file voters, the party is permeated with anti-democratic political attitudes and agendas. And the prospects for rescuing the Republican Party, at least in the short term, look grim indeed. Today’s Republicans really hate Democrats — and democracy 1) Trump’s supporters have embraced anti-democratic ideas This chart shows results from a two-part survey, conducted in late 2020 and early 2021, of hardcore Trump supporters. The political scientists behind the survey, Rachel Blum and Christian Parker, identified so-called “MAGA voters” by their activity on pro-Trump Facebook pages. Their subjects are engaged and committed Republican partisans, disproportionately likely to influence conflicts within the party like primary elections. These voters, according to Blum and Parker, are hostile to bedrock democratic principles. They go further than “merely” believing the 2020 election was stolen, a nearly unanimous view among the bunch. Over 90 percent oppose making it easier for people to vote; roughly 70 percent would support a hypothetical third term for Trump (which would be unconstitutional). “The MAGA movement,” Blum and Parker write, “is a clear and present danger to American democracy.” 2) Republicans are embracing violence The ultimate expression of anti-democratic politics is resorting to violence. More than twice as many Republicans as Democrats — nearly two in five Republicans — said in a January poll that force could be justified against their opponents. It would be easy to dismiss this kind of finding as meaningless were it not for the January 6 attack on Capitol Hill — and the survey was conducted about three weeks after the attack. Republicans recently saw what political violence in the United States looked like, and a large fraction of the party faithful seemed comfortable with more of it. These attitudes are linked to the party elite’s rhetoric: The more party leaders like Trump attack the democratic political system as rigged against them, the more Republicans will believe it and conclude that extreme measures are justifiable. A separate study by political scientists Lilliana Mason and Nathan Kalmoe found that “Republicans who believe Democrats cheated in the election (83 percent in our study) were far likelier to endorse post-election violence.” 3) Republicans see Democrats as something worse than mere rivals Democracy is, among other things, a system for taming the disagreements inherent in politics: People compete for power under a set of mutually agreeable rules, seeing each other as rivals within a shared system rather than blood enemies. But in the United States today, hyperpolarization is undoing this basic democratic premise: Sizable numbers of Americans on each side see the members of the other party not as political opponents but as existential threats. The rise of this dangerous species of “negative partisanship,” as political scientists call it, is asymmetric. While many Democrats see Republicans in a dark light, a majority still see them more as political rivals than as enemies. Among Republicans, however, a solid majority see Democrats as their enemy. When you believe the opposing party to be an enemy, the costs of letting them win become too high, and anti-democratic behavior — rigging the game in your favor, even outright violence — starts to become thinkable. 4) Republicans dislike compromise America’s founders designed our political system around compromise. But for years now, majorities of Republican voters have opposed compromise on principle, consistently telling pollsters that they prefer politicians who stick to their ideological guns rather than give a little to get things done. It’s no wonder the past decade saw unprecedented Republican obstructionism in Congress (more on that later). The hostility to compromise on the GOP side has at least two major implications for democracy. First, it has rendered government dysfunctional and ineffective — and consequently has decreased public trust in government. Second, it has pushed Democrats in a more polarized direction; in 2018, Pew found, Democratic support for political compromise plummeted to roughly Republican levels. This seems in part like a reaction to years of GOP behavior: If they aren’t going to compromise with us, the Democratic logic goes, then why should we compromise with them? But the more Democrats eschew compromise, the more cause Republicans have to see them as fundamentally hostile to conservative values — and to redouble their intransigence. It’s a doom loop for political coexistence. 5) The Republican Party is a global outlier — and not in a good way Pippa Norris/Global Parties Survey The Democratic Party does better than the global median on metrics of respect for norms and support for ethnic minority rights. The GOP does far worse. The Global Party Survey is a 2019 poll of nearly 2,000 experts on political parties from around the world. The survey asked respondents to rate political parties on two axes: the extent to which they are committed to basic democratic principles and their commitment to protecting rights for ethnic minorities. This chart shows the results of the survey for all political parties in the OECD, a group of wealthy democratic states, with the two major American parties highlighted in red. The GOP is an extreme outlier compared to mainstream conservative parties in other wealthy democracies, like Canada’s CPC or Germany’s CDU. Its closest peers are almost uniformly radical right and anti-democratic parties. This includes Turkey’s AKP (a regime that is one of the world’s leading jailers of journalists), and Poland’s PiS (which has threatened dissenting judges with criminal punishment). The verdict of these experts is clear: The Republican Party is one of the most anti-democratic political parties in the developed world. How things got this bad 6) The Republican turn against democracy begins with race Larry Bartels Republicans with high levels of “ethnic antagonism” generally agree with statements like “It is hard to trust the results of elections when so many people will vote for anyone who offers a handout.” Support for authoritarian ideas in America is closely tied to the country’s long-running racial conflicts. This chart, from a September 2020 paper by Vanderbilt professor Larry Bartels, shows a statistical analysis of a survey of Republican voters, analyzing the link between respondents’ score on a measure of “ethnic antagonism” and their support for four anti-democratic statements (e.g., “the traditional American way of life is disappearing so fast that we may have to use force to save it”). The graphic shows a clear finding: The higher a voter scores on the ethnic antagonism scale, the more likely they are tosupport anti-democratic ideas. This held true even when Bartels used regression analyses to compare racial attitudes to other predictors, like support for Trump. “The strongest predictor by far of these antidemocratic attitudes is ethnic antagonism,” he writes. For students of American history, this shouldn’t be a surprise. The 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act cemented Democrats as the party of racial equality, causing racially resentful Democrats in the South and elsewhere to defect to the Republican Party. This sorting process, which took place over the next few decades, is the key reason America is so polarized. It also explains why Republicans are increasingly willing to endorse anti-democratic political tactics and ideas. In the past, restrictions on the franchise served to protect white political power in a changing country; today, as demographic change threatens to further undermine the central place of white Americans, many are becoming comfortable with an updated version of the Jim Crow South’s authoritarian tradition. 7) Partisanship causes Republicans to justify anti-democratic behavior Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik This chart looks at early versus in-person voting in the 2017 Montana House special election. After the Republican candidate assaulted a reporter the day before the election, he appears to have lost support in Democratic precincts but saw gains in some heavily Republican ones. This chart is a little hard to parse, but it illustrates a crucial finding from one of the best recent papers on anti-democratic sentiment in America: how decades of rising partisanship made an anti-democratic GOP possible. The paper, from Yale’s Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik, uses a number of methods to examine the effect of partisanship on views of democracy. This chart shows a particularly interesting one: a “natural experiment” in Montana’s 2017 at-large House campaign, during which Republican candidate Greg Gianforte assaulted reporter Ben Jacobs during an attempted interview just before Election Day. Because many voters cast their ballots by mail before the assault happened, Graham and Svolik could compare these to the in-person votes after the assaultin order to measure how the news of Gianforte’s attack shifted voters’ behavior. The blue lines represent precincts where Gianforte did worse on Election Day than in mail-in ballots; the red lines represent the reverse. What you see is a clear trend: In Democratic-leaning and centrist precincts, Gianforte suffered a penalty. But in general, the more right-leaning a precinct was, the less likely he was to suffer — and the more likely he was to improve on his mail-in numbers. For Svolik and Graham, this illustrates a broader point: Extreme partisanship creates the conditions for democratic decline. If you really care about your side wielding power, you’re more willing to overlook misbehavior in their attempts to win it. They find evidence that this could apply to partisans of either major party — but only one party nominates candidates like Trump and Gianforte (who won not only the 2017 contest but also his reelection bid in 2018 and Montana’s gubernatorial election in 2020). 8) The crucial impact of the right-wing media Kevin Arceneaux, Martin Johnson, Rene Lindstadt, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen In a study covering 1997 to 2002, congressional Republicans in districts where Fox News was available grew considerably more likely to vote with the party as it got closer to election time. The chart here is from a study covering 1997 to 2002, when Fox News was still being rolled out across the country. The study compared members of Congress in districts where Fox News was available to members in districts where it wasn’t, specifically examining how frequently they voted along party lines. They found that Republicans in districts with Fox grew considerably more likely to vote with the party as it got closer to election time, whereas Republicans without Fox actually grew less likely to do so. The expansion of Fox News, in short, seemingly served a disciplining function: making Republican members of Congress more afraid of the consequences of breaking with the party come election time and thus less inclined to engage in bipartisan legislative efforts. “Members with Fox News in their district behave as if they believe that more Republicans will turn out at the polls by increasing their support for the Republican Party,” the authors conclude. How America’s political system creates space for Republicans to undermine democracy 9) Republicans havean unpopular policy agenda Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson, Let Them Eat Tweets Support in polls on major legislation since 1990; Republican bills with tax cuts for wealthy people and Obamacare repeal were especially unpopular. The Republican policy agenda is extremely unpopular. The chart here, taken from Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson’s recent book Let Them Eat Tweets, compares the relative popularity of the two major legislative efforts of Trump’s first term — tax cuts and Obamacare repeal — to similar high-priority bills in years past. The contrast is striking: The GOP’s modern economic agenda is widely disliked even compared to unpopular bills of the past, a finding consistent with a lot of recent polling data. Hacker and Pierson argue that this drives Republicans’ emphasis on culture war and anti-Democratic identity politics. This strategy, which they term “plutocratic populism,” allows the party’s super-wealthy backers to get their tax cuts while the base gets the partisan street fight they crave. The GOP can do this because America’s political system is profoundly unrepresentative. The coalition it can assemble — overwhelmingly white Christian, heavily rural, and increasingly less educated — is a shrinking minority that has lost the popular vote in seven of the past eight presidential contests. But its voters are ideally positioned to give Republicans advantages in the Electoral College and the Senate, allowing the party to remain viable despite representing significantly fewer voters than the Democrats do. 10) Some of the most consequential Republican attacks on democracy happen at the state level This map from the Brennan Center for Justice shows every state that passed a restriction on the franchise between 2010 and 2019. These restrictions, ranging from voter ID laws to felon disenfranchisement, were generally passed by Republican majorities with the intent of hurting turnout among Democratic-leaning constituencies. Republican state legislators were sometimes explicit about this: “Voter ID ... is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania,” then-state House Majority Leader Mike Turzai bragged during the 2012 presidential election cycle. Because Republicans dominated the 2010 midterm elections, Republican statehouses got to control the post-2010 census redistricting process at both the House and state legislative level, leading to extreme gerrymandering in Republican-controlled states unlike anything in Democratic ones. Conservative control of the Supreme Court enabled this state-level push. In 2013, the Court struck down the Voting Rights Act’s “preclearance” requirement — that states with a history of racial discrimination would be required to get permission from the Justice Department on their maps and other major changes to electoral law. In 2019, another Court ruling paved the way for further partisan gerrymandering. 11) The national GOP has broken government Today’s Senate, where you need 60 votes to get virtually anything done, is a historical anomaly. Its roots can be traced to the unyielding GOP opposition to President Barack Obama in 2009 and 2010, when Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell turned the Senate into a dysfunctional body in which priority legislation was routinely subject to a filibuster. When Republicans won a Senate majority in 2014, McConnell found a new way to deny Obama victories: blocking his judicial appointments. These actions were an expression of an attitude popular among Republican voters and leaders alike: that Democrats can never be legitimate leaders, even if elected, and thus do not deserve to wield power. It’s still Trump’s GOP 12) Republicans didn’t care when Trump abused his power The Trump presidency was a test of Republican attitudes toward democracy. Time and again, the president abused his authority in ways that would have been unthinkable under previous presidents. Time and again, members of Congress, state party leaders, right-wing media stars, and rank-and-file voters looked the other way — or even cheered him on. The chart here, which shows two NBC polls taken about a year apart, is particularly striking. It shows that support for Trump’s first and second impeachment among Republicans remained exactly the same among Republicans: 8 percent. Trump was impeached the first time because he tried to interfere with the integrity of the 2020 presidential election — attempting to strong-arm the Ukrainian president into opening up a bogus investigation into Joe Biden. Trump was impeached the second time because he ginned up a mob to attack the Capitol to disrupt the counting of the votes from the Electoral College. And yet in both cases, the percentage of Republicans who supported impeaching him was the same — a measly 8 percent. There’s just very little popular appetite in the GOP for punishing anti-democratic excesses by Trump, regardless of the circumstances. 13) Trump and Trumpism could return in 2024 This chart shows the results of a Morning Consult poll on the 2024 Republican primary held after Trump’s second impeachment trial. It found that 54 percent of Republicans would choose Trump again, even when given a wide range of alternative possibilities. Six percent would choose his son Donald Trump Jr. — who obviously wouldn’t run if his father did — putting the Trump family support in the GOP primary electorate at around 60 percent. This shouldn’t really be surprising. All the reasons for the GOP’s turn against democracy — backlash to racial progress, rising partisanship, a powerful right-wing media sphere — remain in force after Trump. The leadership is still afraid of Trump and the anti-democratic MAGA movement he commands. More fundamentally, they are still committed to a political approach that can’t win in a majoritarian system, requiring the defense of the undemocratic status quo in institutions like the Senate and in state-level electoral rules. Republicans still control the bulk of statehouses and are gearing up for a new round of voter suppression bills and extreme gerrymandering in electorally vital states like Georgia and Texas. It’s very hard to see how any of this gets better. It’s very easy to see how it gets worse.
vox.com
Dylann Roof Massacred Her Family—Here's Why She Wants Him Off Death Row
Rev. Sharon Risher told Newsweek she is calling for an end to federal executions, even though it will spare the life of the white supremacist who killed her 70-year-old mother, two cousins and a childhood friend at Emanuel AME Church in 2015.
newsweek.com
Forensic experts suggest Tiger Woods may have fallen asleep at the wheel
Tiger Woods appeared to not be paying attention in the moments before his devastating crash – and may have fallen asleep at the wheel of the luxury SUV he was driving.
nypost.com
Who Is Jason Campbell? 'TikTok Doc' Hit With $45 Million Sexual Assault Lawsuit
According to the lawsuit, the alleged victim's car was vandalized with spray paint after she came forward.
newsweek.com
Live updates: Biden to meet virtually with Mexico’s leader as the Senate continues to scrutinize his Cabinet picks
Migration and combating covid-19 will be among the topics discussed by Biden and Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, according to the White House.
washingtonpost.com
Read Jane Fonda's powerful Golden Globes speech on diversity
"If my heart is open and I look beneath the surface, I feel kinship," Fonda said while accepting the Cecil B. DeMille Award​.
cbsnews.com