Generally
General
743

$353,000 in jewelry reportedly stolen from apartments in Trump Tower

Detectives in New York City are investigating reports of two thefts inside apartments in Trump Tower on Sunday that resulted in more than $350,000 worth of gems stolen—including a $117,000 diamond bracelet from an apartment on the 59th floor.
Load more
Go to source
unread news
unread news (Demo user)
Kendrick Perkins threatens to fight Nets fan over Kyrie Irving criticism
Kendrick Perkins was the fan favorite in his Twitter feud with Kevin Durant last week. He will have a hard time finding supporters in his latest keyboard war. Perkins, the former NBA center, has had some active Twitter fingers since he was hired as an ESPN analyst in 2019. His most recent target appears to...
6 m
nypost.com
NFL Legend Morten Andersen on Why the Chiefs Can Win the Super Bowl and What It Takes to Be a Hall of Famer
One of only two kickers ever inducted in the Hall of Fame, the "Great Dane" reveals what is like to be a kicker in the NFL and whether the Chiefs can win the Super Bowl
7 m
newsweek.com
Fashion designer Jean Paul Gaultier is retiring from the runway
"This show celebrating 50 years of my career will also be my last," Gaultier tweeted on Friday. "But rest assured Haute Couture will continue with a new concept."
8 m
nypost.com
Finding success in the cannabis industry sometimes means not mentioning cannabis
Outbound's overhaul reflects the lengths cannabis companies go to establish brand recognition amid a patchwork of state laws and no interstate commerce.
9 m
edition.cnn.com
Dwayne Johnson posts touching tribute to his late father
Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson released is paying tribute to his legendary father, Rocky Johnson, who passed away this week at age 75.
9 m
edition.cnn.com
The market's earnings losing streak may be about to end
Earnings season is off to a strong start so far. If the trend continues, then Corporate America may break its streak of three consecutive quarters where profits dropped year-over-year -- a phenomenon that's been dubbed an earnings recession.
edition.cnn.com
Explainer: How close is Iran to producing a nuclear bomb?
The central achievement of the Iran nuclear deal - keeping Tehran at arm's length from nuclear weapons - is eroding.
reuters.com
Lori Loughlin, other parents in college admissions scandal to go to trial in staggered groups
Fifteen parents still fighting charges in the nation's college admissions scandal, including Lori Loughlin, will go to trial in groups this year.        
usatoday.com
White House Claims Safe Third Country Agreements 'Will Save Thousands of Lives,' Slams ACLU Over 'Frivolous' Lawsuit
Immigration advocates have warned that the safe third country deals will endanger the lives of asylum seekers sent back to Central America.
newsweek.com
Iran's Supreme Leader Reinforces Attacks On Trump And 'American Clowns' On Twitter After First Public Sermon In Eight Years
"These American clowns lie in utter viciousness that they stand with the Iranian people," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said.
newsweek.com
Secretary Pompeo Breaks Silence on Alleged Threats to Envoy in Ukraine
Pompeo had been harshly criticized by lawmakers and diplomats for not addressing the matter
time.com
House Democrat Dingell says she's 'scared' about division of the country as impeachment trial begins
After the Senate impeachment trial began yesterday, Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., on Friday raised concern about the aftermath of the impeachment against President Trump on the divided condition among the American people.
foxnews.com
MSNBC Host Says History Is Going to Treat GOP Senators 'Very Badly' Ahead of Trump's Senate Trial
Joe Scarborough said that history will reflect poorly on Republican senators in Trump's impeachment trial, if they do not provide a fair one.
newsweek.com
Wall St at record levels after strong U.S., China data
U.S. stock indexes nudged higher to fresh record levels on Friday after strong housing data and indications of resilience in the Chinese economy raised hopes of a rebound in global growth.
reuters.com
Kylie Jenner shows her shape in a print jumpsuit and more star snaps
Kylie Jenner shops for jewelry in style, Kelly Rowland supports Beyoncé and more...
nypost.com
She was suspected of killing dozens of children. Now, woman dubbed 'killer nurse' gets life sentence
Genene Jones, 69, was suspected of killings dozens of children at a San Antonio hospital more than three decades ago.       
usatoday.com
Trump: Impeachment trial is a scheme to hurt Bernie Sanders’ chances in Iowa
President Trump seems to really want to face far-far left Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders in the general election  — tweeting Friday that the Senate impeachment trial is going to hurt the senator.
nypost.com
Pae White's art is an uplifting ride on the Beverly Center escalators
If you haven't been to the shopping center in awhile, Pae White's art installations are reason to go
latimes.com
Tim Cook is a cautionary tale for CEOs trying to get close to Trump
Apple CEO Tim Cook has spent years building up reserves of goodwill with the White House — meeting President Donald Trump for dinners, showing him around a Texas factory and appearing alongside Ivanka Trump to promote an education initiative.
edition.cnn.com
Trump adds legal heavyweights Starr, Dershowitz to impeachment team
President Donald Trump turned to some legal heavyweights to help defend him in his Senate impeachment trial with the addition on Friday of former independent counsel Ken Starr, who paved the way for former President Bill Clinton's 1998 impeachment, and prominent lawyer Alan Dershowitz.
reuters.com
Bernie Sanders Leads All Democratic Candidates in New Hampshire, Poll Shows
On February 11, New Hampshire will be the second state to decide which Democratic candidate voters prefer to nominate on the 2020 ballot.
newsweek.com
Ghana looks to capitalize on tourism with "Year of Return"
Ghana has attracted visitors from all over the world with its "Year of Return" campaign. 2019 marked 400 years since the first documented slave ship landed in Virginia, and Ghana encouraged African Americans and others to "come home" to the country many of those ships departed from. Chiké Frankie Edozien, journalist and director of Accra-NYU, joins CBSN to explain the significance and impact.
cbsnews.com
Decades-old Apalachicola Basin water dispute between Georgia and Florida heads to Supreme Court
For three decades, Florida and Georgia have been entangled in a legal battle over the Apalachicola Basin, with Florida claiming it is not getting a fair usage of the water supply.
foxnews.com
Trump gives LSU football team a championship welcome
President Donald Trump held a ceremony on Friday at the White House for the Louisiana State University football team to celebrate their recent national championship game win.
edition.cnn.com
Teacher busts a move in viral TikTok dance videos
Kentucky middle school teacher Craig Smith went viral on video-sharing social platform TikTok after he posted videos of himself dancing to find common ground with his students.
edition.cnn.com
Pompeo says State Dept will do everything to evaluate if Yovanovitch was under threat
The U.S. State Department will do everything it needs to do to determine if former U.S. ambassador Marie Yovanovitch was under threat in Ukraine, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a radio interview on Friday,
reuters.com
Why Twitter Is Messy, Glitched, and in Love With Drama
Something odd happened this week on Twitter: A hashtag became the most popular topic in the country by accident.After Senator Elizabeth Warren brushed away the handshake of Senator Bernie Sanders in the moments following a debate, Sanders supporters—or, at least alleged Sanders supporters—began to tweet the hashtag #NeverWarren. Several left-leaning journalists and online Sanders surrogates noticed the rising phrase and sent tweets opposing it. But since their tweets accumulated likes and retweets, they only made the hashtag itself more popular. The algorithm that determines the social network’s most popular topics, after all, could not differentiate between a tweet endorsing #NeverWarren and a tweet rejecting it. When the NBC reporter Ben Collins noticed this phenomenon and tweeted about it, his own tweet accumulated more than 7,500 likes and retweets, and lofted the hashtag even higher.It was faintly ridiculous. It seemed to encapsulate many of the issues with hosting the public sphere on Twitter. And it made me think of Walter Ong, a linguist and Jesuit priest who died at 91 in 2003. Ong spent his life trying to understand the revolutionary technologies, such as the television and the radio, unleashed during his lifetime. But he did so by looking far from modern America—and by studying the difference between human cultures rooted in orality and those rooted in literacy. His topic matters for Twitter more than you may think.Twitter is neither the country’s largest nor its wealthiest social network, but nonetheless it exhibits a curiously tight grip on American culture. In the past decade, it has played a prominent role—if an occasionally overstated one—in the Arab Spring, the #BlackLivesMatter movement, and the 2016 presidential election. The president of the United States, famously, cannot be torn from Twitter; the chair of the Federal Reserve and several Supreme Court justices reportedly consult it for news, gossip, and debate. If Facebook is the high-school cafeteria where everyone must line up for their slop, Twitter is the classroom where all the the nerdy kids go to eat their lunch—though perhaps this metaphor is too generous: Teenagers, for all their flaws, are kinder and less calculating than many Twitter-adept adults.Twitter is especially beloved by the press, andthe unfortunate affinity that journalists and policymakers have for the social network means that—like politics itself—you may not care about Twitter, but it cares about you, especially if you’ve just done something embarrassing on national television. Reformed Twitter users who’ve quit the service talk about how tweets are inescapable. They are embedded in news stories, screencapped for Instagram, and quoted on TV shows and podcasts.[Read: Twitter’s new features aren’t what users asked for]The sum effect is that Twitter is both leaderless and influential, little used and widely reviled. And at its best, even now, it can still be wonderful: There is a joy and exhilaration in watching a democratic culture at work, at getting to see dozens of people grow and think in real time. At its worst, its rabble seems to adopt that old knock against the British newspapers—that they wield power without responsibility—as a proud boast and a way of life.The spark for the Warren-Sanders spat came on Monday night, CNN broke the story that the Vermont senator, during a private meeting in 2018, had told Warren that he did not believe a woman could beat Trump. Immediately my timeline filled with Democrats expressing all manner of views about the incident. Many were angry or dismayed or confused. Virtually all of them did not want the story to eclipse what they saw as Biden’s shortcomings or the ongoing impeachment proceedings against President Trump. Yet they kept making jokes about the CNN story, or complaining about it, or airing hypotheses about it—and so the story seemed to be all that anyone was talking about all night. Eventually, almost without being able to stop themselves, Warren and Sanders’ online surrogates were correcting each other’s attempts at tact, and then arguing, and then making a scene.And maybe the story shouldhave stirred up that froth ofconflict and attention. But none of the people who drove its prominence actually seemed to think it deserved that attention. They all said, at least, that they wanted the media to talk about other things. But the Warren-Sanders spat is what they did talk about it.This contradiction hinted at a basic tension of the platform. From my perspective, as a single Twitter user, the online horde is always going on about something. So if I tweet about that something, it’s not a big deal: I’m only thinking aloud, goofing off, and harmlessly chatting with my friends and readers. But if 50 other people tweet about the same thing—especially if it’s frivolous and especially if they all have, like I do, an account with more than thousand or so followers—then they’re making that topic even more popular, amplifying it, and reinforcing the media’s toxic fixation on meaningless chaff. My tweets—well, not my tweets, but you get it—are conversational and informal, and they matter relatively little. But taken collectively, everyone else’s tweets are informational and declamatory. They carry weight. This instability—between the individual and the mass, the high and the low—is also what makes Twitter fun. The site’s worst users are those who monotonously, humorlessly post about the same thing over and over again. But in trying to avoid that fate—and in trying, generally, to act like a regular person online—users push the conversation toward conflict and superficiality. There is no difference, on Twitter, between talking about an idea and amplifying its reach.[Read: How Twitter fuels anxiety]Ong would have understood. Writing down a language, he realized, is not just a mere shuffling of papers; it forever changes how the language works. Consider the differences between speech and text. For oral cultures, words are primarily vibrations in the air, Ong argued. Words must therefore be memorable, few in number, and tied to the concrete reality of day-to-day life. But after the advent of writing, words become more than invisible sounds. They become permanent symbols that exist outside their utterance and can be read long after the speaker has died. Words can also divorce from the physical world and start to reference ideas, concepts, and abstract states. And instead of words needing to aid memory, as it does in oral cultures (by using a repeated epithet, such as Homer’s “wine-dark sea”); written words can suddenly act as a form of memory themselves.Before Ong died in 2003, he was asked about a special kind of writing that people do online, a genre of communication familiar to any Slack, AIM, or group-chat texter. It’s a mode that delivers words live and at the speed of speech—where, as Ong put it: “textualized verbal exchange registers psychologically as having the temporal immediacy of oral exchange.” (This is apparently how a Jesuit talks about sliding into DMs.) Ong called this new fusion secondary literacy, but today we just call it texting. Whatever its name, it reigned during Twitter’s early days. As I once wrote: “Twitter lets users read the same words at different times, which is a key aspect of literacy. Tweets are chatty, fusing word and action like orality; and also declarative, severable, preservable, and analyzable like literacy.”But by 2014, the Canadian academic Bonnie Stewart had noticed a change in how Twitter worked as a social space. Tweets that were written as chatty musings for one group of users were interpreted as print-like declamations by another. “The rot we’re seeing in Twitter is the rot of participatory media devolved into competitive spheres,” she said, “where the collective ‘we’ treats conversational contributions as fixed print-like identity claims.”I was so taken with this idea that I later wrote about it. Six years later, her observation still resonates with insight, even if it no longer feels like news: Twitter has been a mess of speech-like tweets interpreted as print, and print-like tweets interpreted as speech, for as long as most users can remember. This whiplash between orality and literacy is even part of what makes it fun.But in the wake of this week, I’ve wondered if that instability presents a political problem—particularly for the left in the United States. The word that sticks out to me now from Stewart’s post is identity. The bedrock of politics is that it forges what the leftwing calls solidarity: a sense of shared identity or common interest that transcends whatever other differences among people exist. In America, this challenge is more difficult for the center-left Democrats, who are the more heterogenous of the parties. What Jesse Jackson said at the party’s 1988 national convention is still true today: None of the Democratic coalitions—be they farmers, trade unionists, feminists, people of color, or LGBTQ folks—command a big enough “patch” of America to win power for themselves. He continued that Democrats must therefore “build such a quilt” that binds the patches. They must, in other words, forge solidarity. And not much shreds solidarity faster than misstating, or misinterpreting, a co-partisan’s statement about their identity.Even for those elsewhere on the political spectrum, the whole situation suggests two ideas, neither of which is particularly encouraging. First: Twitter is now so global and crowded and multifaceted that it no longer has a unified “we” at all. Twitter, en masse, isn’t anything like a thinking public; it’s just a bunch of people. Second, it suggest an axiom so Puritan that I hesitate to express it: On Twitter, ideas are so commodified that to say something is simultaneously to amplify it. You’re never “just saying” on Twitter. You’re always doing.
theatlantic.com
Trump Judges Are Playing Keep-Away With His Tax Returns and Other Financial Records
The Ways and Means Committee first brought the tax returns case last July.
slate.com
The Women’s Marches are shrinking. Their influence isn’t.
Attendees at the Women’s March “Power to the Polls” voter registration tour launch at Sam Boyd Stadium on January 21, 2018, in Las Vegas. | Sam Morris/Getty Images It’s not just about marching anymore — it’s about voting. Laurie Pohutsky says she went to the 2017 Women’s March because “I had just watched a person who had admitted to sexually assaulting women on tape be elected president of the United States.” As a survivor of sexual assault, she told Vox, “I was outraged, I was angry, I was sad, and I knew that this was an opportunity to make a stand.” When she got to Washington, DC, on January 21, 2017, she heard speaker after speaker say America needed more women running for office. “I remember getting this pit in my stomach,” she said, thinking, “that’s it. That’s what I need to do.” The Michigan Democrat, then working as a microbiologist, decided to run for state legislature. She began knocking on doors in May 2017, and after a hard-fought primary and general election the following year, she won a seat in Michigan’s House of Representatives that had been held by Republicans for the past 40 years. She was one of a wave of female candidates elected in 2018 at both the national and state levels. She was also part of an evolution for the Women’s March, from a one-day event to a movement that, its leaders hope, will have a major influence on elections. Attendance at the marches has declined over the years, especially after allegations that some organizers made anti-Semitic comments became public in 2018. But during that time, organizers around the country have been working to channel the energy of the marches into action at the polls. They believe they’ve already seen results — in Nevada, for example, where the Women’s March launched a major voter registration drive in 2018, turnout among Democrats increased and voters elected the state’s first majority-women legislature, Lucy Flores, treasurer for the Women’s March, told Vox. The Women’s March efforts weren’t the only factor, she said, but they were part of a larger push that “not only inspired people to vote but inspired women to run, and ultimately ended up making history.” The Women’s March has faced questions since before the first marchers came to DC. Some wondered whether the event, initially proposed by white women, would be inclusive of the concerns of women of color. Others asked whether a single protest could really produce lasting change. Three years later, one thing is clear: The march itself has become less central, replaced in many ways by more decentralized efforts to elect progressive candidates. Whether those efforts will succeed in 2020 remains to be seen. But whatever happens, many say the past three years have seen incredible growth in women’s activism around the country, fueled in part by the marches and the energy they created. “Women are the majority of voters,” Kira Sanbonmatsu, a political science professor and co-author of the book A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters, told Vox. “Women have a lot of political influence, and I think what we’re seeing is that women are realizing that power.” The first Women’s Marches were just one day, but the movement wasn’t over The first Women’s March took place the day after President Trump’s inauguration. While the march was initially conceived as a protest against his presidency, the organizers of the DC event developed an official platform detailing a variety of progressive goals, from reproductive justice to a living wage for all workers. While not everyone shared all the priorities laid out in the platform, more than 4 million people marched in DC and other cities around the country, making the 2017 march likely the largest single-day protest in US history. Millions more participated in sister marches around the world, from South Africa to Brazil. As a demonstration, the marches were in many ways a success (Trump, for his part, reportedly was furious). But then the organizers had to set about the work of movement-building. They didn’t always agree on how to do it. The Women’s March had inspired controversy from the beginning, when early organizers, many of whom were white, called the event the “Million Women March” — a name that reminded many women of color of 1997’s Million Woman March, an event designed to protest, in part, black women’s exclusion from the white-dominated feminist movement. Many people wondered whether it made sense to have a march for all women when 53 percent of white female voters had cast their ballots for Trump. Some white women were offended by the criticisms, with some even canceling their trips to DC. In the wake of the events, organizers split off into a variety of groups. One, Women’s March Inc., was led by Tamika Mallory, Carmen Perez, Linda Sarsour, and Bob Bland, co-chairs of the original event. Another, March On, started by march co-founder Vanessa Wruble and others, aimed to target red states and adopted a slightly more centrist message. But both groups set their sights on influencing elections. For Women’s March Inc., that meant holding a training for prospective candidates at its Women’s Convention in October 2017 — representatives from the group Emily’s List talked fundraising and strategy to a packed room of around 175 people, many of whom said they were inspired to run by Trump’s election. And in 2018, it meant launching Power to the Polls, a voter registration drive in 10 swing states, with its kickoff in Las Vegas. The impact went beyond Nevada, Flores said. Power to the Polls registered tens of thousands of voters nationwide. Meanwhile, Women’s March Inc., worked with other groups like Mijente, Indivisible, and the Justice Democrats to back progressive candidates and policies around the country. All those groups were able to take advantage of a boom in left-wing voter engagement around the country in the wake of Trump’s election, Flores said — whether it was the Women’s March or something else that directly inspired them, more and more people were “just tired of sitting on the sidelines.” Pohutsky is one of many lawmakers who have cited the Women’s March as an inspiration. Others include Connecticut state Reps. Jane Garibay and Pat Wilson Pheanious, as well as US Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), one of a record number of women elected to Congress in 2018. Of course, the success of women — and Democrats — in the 2018 elections had many causes, but experts say the Women’s March was likely a factor. In a study of Americans who took any form of political action following the 2016 election by the research firm PerryUndem, many respondents described the march as “the first time they felt hope,” PerryUndem partner Tresa Undem told Vox. At the march, one Latina woman told the researchers, “I felt a real sense of camaraderie and the fact that so many strangers were in the same place really fighting for what they believed in on women’s issues.” The march “felt so good and empowering afterward,” an Asian American woman said. She thought, “Okay, but now what? Right, what’s next?” Had the Women’s March not happened, “I don’t know that people would have felt as empowered,” Undem said, “and that’s what you need to get people out to vote.” The marches, of course, were not necessarily empowering for everyone. Though many women of color, like the ones interviewed by PerryUndem, did march, many said they felt excluded by white attendees and organizers. Attorney and writer S.T. Holloway, who is black, attended the 2017 march in Los Angeles and later wrote at HuffPost that “the first and last time I heard ‘Black Lives Matter’ chanted was when my two girlfriends and I began the chant.” The centering of white women and their concerns at the marches was a symptom of a larger problem, she wrote: “a culture where millions protest when white women’s access to health care is threatened, but when black maternal death rates in the United States are on par with women in countries like Mexico and Uzbekistan, there is no national outrage or call for reform or worldwide protest.” In the months following the first march,the organizers tried to address concerns like these, and worked to make white women who had become politically active through the marches more aware of issues affecting women of color. At the Women’s Convention, for example, a panel titled “Confronting White Womanhood,” which discussed the roles white women can play in racism, was so well-attended that organizers decided to repeat it the following day. And there’s evidence that the marches and other movements of the past three years have made white women more aware of how intersecting racism and sexism impact women of color. Undem described a series of recent interviews in suburban Missouri, in which a 55-year-old white woman used the term “white privilege,” while another white woman reflected on whether she should be attending Black Lives Matter marches. Both attitudes would have been unusual for women in their demographic just a few years ago. Overall, “organizing as women is always complicated by differences among women,” Sanbonmatsu, the political scientist, said. But the years since Trump’s election have been characterized by “a vibrancy around women’s activism,” with a record number of women running for office and giving money to political candidates. The marches were just one part of that activism. But “what the original Women’s March seemed to tap into was discontent with the status of women in the country,” Sanbonmatsu said, “and that discontent continues to reverberate.” The marches are shrinking, but their impact remains However, controversy around the marches and their organizers has continued to reverberate as well. In early 2018, co-chair Tamika Mallory was criticized for attending an event with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan where he espoused anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.And that December, Tablet magazine reported that according to several others involved in planning the march, Mallory and Perez had made anti-Semitic comments at a planning meeting in November 2016. Representatives from Women’s March Inc. denied the allegations, but the organization got a raft of negative press, and attendance at the 2019 march was smaller than in 2017 or 2018. Since then, Women’s March Inc. has changed its leadership, with Mallory, Sarsour, and Bland stepping down. In addition, the group has added more than a dozen new board members, including Flores. This year, “we’re completely focused on the future,” Flores said, which includes “doing a very different kind of march.” Unlike in years past, there will be no main stage in DC. “We wanted the attention and the focus to be on the marchers,” Flores said. Once again, the number of those marchers is expected to shrink, with about 10,000 people expected in DC, according to the Washington Post, less than one-tenth the number who attended the original march. To some degree, that’s to be expected, as those who once marched now channel their energy into other activities — including running for office. “I don’t know that we can judge the state of women’s political activism today just based on numbers at a particular march,” Sanbonmatsu said. And while the march was initially conceived as a single event, Women’s March Inc. now sees it as a larger movement of which the January demonstrations are only a part. “The marches have their place to just have people gather, and to feel like they’re part of something bigger, but ultimately a march in and of itself doesn’t accomplish anything,” Flores said. “We have to focus on the continued work.” In 2020, that work will include grassroots efforts in swing states to defeat Trump and elect progressive candidates, Flores said. But it will also include thinking about what happens if a Democrat does win in November. “There might not be a march next year, because hopefully we don’t need one,” Flores said. But even if there’s no protest in January 2021, Women’s March Inc. will continue to push for immigrants’ rights, reproductive justice, action on climate change, and other priorities, she said. “There will always be a need for accountability.” For Pohutsky, 2020 means getting back out on the campaign trail for her reelection bid. In the Michigan legislature, she’s championed bills to strengthen environmental protections and get rid of a loophole in state law that makes it legal to drug and rape a spouse. She hopes to continue that work, but she won by the smallest margin of any flipped seat two years ago, “so we’re going to be campaigning hard this year,” she said. As for the election more broadly, “I hope that the energy that everybody felt that compelled them to go out to these marches just maintains,” she said, “and people just remember why it’s important that we get out and vote.”
vox.com
You can get this cult-favorite blanket for a great price this Valentine's Day
You can get the Big Blanket for a great discount with our exclusive code—just in time for Valentine's Day.       
usatoday.com
Not all Girl Scout cookies are the same. Which ones are you getting?
Depending on where you live, your local Girl Scout troop may be using different bakeries, meaning your Samoas may be Caramel deLites.       
usatoday.com
Mining magnate: 'We haven't lobbied against climate change'
Iron ore mining magnate Andrew Forrest speaks to Amanpour about his $48 million dollar donation to bushfire relief and defends his sector's role in Australia's climate policy paralysis.
edition.cnn.com
Number of women overtakes men in U.S. workforce
New data from the Labor Department shows that last month, women held just over 50 percent of jobs in the U.S. – surpassing men by 109,000. The last time there were more women than men on U.S. payrolls was in the mid-2010s. Courtenay Brown, a markets reporter for Axios, joined CBSN to discuss what this means for the economy.
cbsnews.com
Former nurse suspected of killing multiple babies (2013)
A former pediatric nurse suspected of killing dozens of young children is set for an early prison release.
edition.cnn.com
What's ahead in the impeachment trial of President Trump
The impeachment trial is set to begin in the Senate on Tuesday, overseen by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
cbsnews.com
Lewinsky offers colorful remark in apparent response to Starr joining Trump defense team
The announcement that former independent counsel Ken Starr is joining President Donald Trump's impeachment defense team surprised many on Friday, but one person, apparently, had an especially notable reaction to the news.
edition.cnn.com
Eminem Tries to Fight Gun Violence While Glorifying It
Gun violence is a crisis that you can see and hear. There’s surveillance footage of the Columbine killings, and the assailants taped home videos bragging about what they were about to do. When a Las Vegas music festival was targeted in 2017, audience video showed the moment when shots began raining down. The alleged Christchurch gunman livestreamed his attack on a mosque in New Zealand last year, and the footage looked like a video game. Such visibility has not curbed violence, clearly. In fact, the way the internet rewards audiovisual spectacle may be an incentive to evil.Art that portrays such killings would, then, seem to have a high bar to clear. They inevitably risk glorifying—aestheticizing, narrativizing, making catchy—that which they condemn. There’s a question of futility too: By what logic would, say, a music video portraying mass shootings shock anyone into activism more than the actual shootings do? Last year, Madonna’s “God Control” video imagined a massacre at a disco club and ended with a call for new firearms regulations. “This is really happening,” the pop star told People. “This is what it looks like. Does it make you feel bad? Good, ’cause then maybe you will do something about it.” Emma Gonzalez, a survivor of the Parkland shooting, replied by tweeting, “Madonna’s new video for her song #GodControl was fucked up, it was horrible.”Eminem has followed in Madonna’s example with the music video for “Darkness,” the first single off an album, Music to Be Murdered By, that he surprise-released today. It recreates the Las Vegas slaying of 58 people, with an actor playing Stephen Paddock, the perpetrator. Eminem raps from the perspective of Paddock as he prepared and then fired from a hotel room across the street from the festival. The verses and visuals string together specific references: The shooter didn’t know his father well, he used Valium and booze, he was a licensed gun owner, he had no known motive, he wrote down targeting calculations, he began to shoot at 10:05 p.m.The song and the video do not simply re-stage the massacre, though. Eminem is attempting a double entendre in which most of the lyrics could equally refer to the rapper himself, sitting in a hotel room, nervous before a concert. He looks out on the crowd early in the night and frets that it’s too sparse: “You can’t murder a show nobody’s at.” He seems to be empathizing with a mass killer by comparing the rapper’s own sense of mental embattlement to the perpetrator’s. This exercise results in no greater understanding of why tragedies like this happen. There’s just ineffable darkness, and the availability of guns allows it to have horrific consequence.Perhaps the point is more that Eminem’s anxiety about performing stems from the fact that concerts have become killing grounds. Probably, though, the main idea is simply to spin a riveting narrative that focuses attention on the message delivered at the end of the video. Eminem looks upon a wall of televisions arranged in the shape of the United States; each screen shows news footage from a shooting. An on-screen message: “WHEN WILL THIS END? WHEN ENOUGH PEOPLE CARE.” Text then directs people to register to vote in order to “change gun laws in America.” Eminem’s website features links to anti-gun-violence organizations including Giffords Law Center, Brady United Against Gun Violence, and March for Our Lives.The anti-violence message may seem rich coming from Eminem, whose lyrics over more than two decades have notoriously depicted graphic murder and mayhem. But he has a political conscience—see his anti-Trump broadsides of recent years—and can reach an audience that many other outspoken performers can’t. Mass shooters tend to be angry, and often white, men—which is also how a significant segment of Eminem’s fanbase can be described. His confrontational style combined with his appeal to a demographic that is not, stereotypically, super-woke does make him uniquely positioned to have an impact.But that power cuts multiple ways. Experts on mass shootings say that in addition to enacting stronger gun laws, one of the best ways to prevent future tragedies is to deny fame to murderers. The copycat phenomenon is real, and when the media broadcasts the names and faces of criminals and obsesses over their backstories, would-be killers get the message that they could become more famous than any of the people whose lives they take. If Eminem jolts his fans into taking action to support gun control, that effect will have to be weighed against this grim fact: One of today’s bestselling musicians has humanized the perpetrator of the deadliest mass killing in modern U.S. history.
theatlantic.com
Barack Obama’s Birthday Message for Michelle Is Full of Fun Photo Booth Pictures
If you’re shivering from the frigid temperatures of mid-January, allow yourself to bask in the warmth and expansive glow of the love expressed by Barack Obama for his wife, Michelle, on her birthday. In a sweet and heartwarming Instagram post on Friday, Barack affirmed his love, admiration, and appreciation for Michelle alongside a set of…
time.com
Video shows crazed man trying to steal display phones at AT&T store
A thief botched an attempt to steal cellphones on display at an AT&T store in Queens and instead looted a wad of cash from the register.
nypost.com
Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson breaks silence on father Rocky’s death: ‘I’m in pain’
"Dad, I wish I had one more shot to tell you, I love you, before you crossed over to the other side."
nypost.com
Harvey Weinstein judge to defense: 'Nothing you said makes logical sense;' 10 jurors in place
Seven jurors have been selected in the Harvey Weinstein trial, and Friday, and his team made a last-ditch effort to have jury selection sequesterd.        
usatoday.com
California is giving camp trailers and modular tents to cities to help the homeless
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday highlighted his government's new provision of modular tents and camp trailers as part of a larger effort to fight homelessness.
edition.cnn.com
A media initiative praised by President Obama
Abaas Mpindi's Media Challenge Initiative is building up the next generation of journalists in Uganda
edition.cnn.com
Was Martin Luther King Jr. a Republican or a Democrat? The Answer Is Complicated
"I’m not concerned about telling you what party to vote for," he said in 1958
time.com
Behind the scenes with a renowned wildlife filmmaker
Brad Bestelink is drawing attention to the plight of the African landscape through his documentary films
edition.cnn.com
Astros' star denies wearing sign-stealing device under his jersey
The Houston Astros' Jose Altuve smashed a two-run, walk-off homer off the Yankees' closer Aroldis Chapman with two outs in the bottom of the ninth last October.
edition.cnn.com
'BMF' Jorge Masvidal sets 3-year timeline: 'I want to be at the highest level when I walk away'
"I want to fight three more (expletive) years is, what I want to do – and at the highest level."       Related StoriesSteve-O wants Conor McGregor to beat Donald Cerrone at UFC 246 so Jorge Masvidal can get paidJorge Masvidal, Kamaru Usman still talk trash, but interest in potential fight differsVideo: Watch UFC 246 ceremonial weigh-ins live on MMA Junkie at 6 p.m. ET 
usatoday.com
Miranda Lambert reveals 'deal-breaker' that would have led to split from Brendan McLoughlin
Miranda Lambert continues to gush about her husband, Brendan McLoughlin, during their first year of marriage. But the country crooner has now revealed the one deal-breaker that would have ended their relationship from the very start.
foxnews.com