Tools

Andrew Luck’s life was always about more than football

Chicago Bears v Indianapolis Colts Photo by Justin Casterline/Getty Images

Retirement is just the first page of a new chapter for the quarterback.

Andrew Luck’s retirement from the NFL came at a weird time. Solemnly, after a preseason game — with only an Adam Schefter tweet to foreshadow what we were about to witness.

We haven’t been conditioned to seeing moments like this. Stoic at the podium, Luck plainly delivered the news in his unmistakable baritone voice:

“This certainly isn’t how I’d envisioned this or planned this, but I am gonna retire.”

While the announcement didn’t come easily for him, Luck was matter of fact about it all. No prolonged pining on a career cut short. It was spoken by someone who has clearly been thinking about his life after football long before making the decision to transition into an existence after the game. And while it hurts the Colts, who now need to scramble to work on a long-term plan for their quarterback situation, the rest of the football world is left to ponder the most shocking retirement since Barry Sanders hung up his cleats on top of his game at 31.

We’re all shocked, but we shouldn’t be. The issue isn’t so much that Luck blindsided everyone with his decision, and more that we’re accustomed to believing that football is the most important thing in every player’s life, making it unimaginable they would ever walk away willingly from the game. The truth is, in hindsight Luck was telling us all along, in his own way, that his life was about more than football.

Luck defied expectations from the second he set foot in college. He made the most of his athletic scholarship to Stanford and didn’t just treat the prestigious school like a stepping stone. Instead, he pursued a degree in architecture — which was mentioned only as a bellwether in broadcasts to underscore his intelligence, rather than a sign he might be interested in something more than throwing a football.

Luck was a lock to be the No. 1 overall pick when Jim Harbaugh left to become head coach of the 49ers in 2011. The Carolina Panthers told him as much, and football fans fully expected he was going to head to the NFL. Luck was draft eligible, was going to be taken No. 1, and his head coach was gone. Players don’t stay in school when this happens — and yet, he did. Luck decided to finish his degree, work under a new coach, and take out an insurance policy on his body should something go wrong on the field.

A year later, the stars aligned. A neck injury to Peyton Manning left the Colts with the No. 1 pick, and suddenly he was staring down the barrel of being heir apparent to the biggest quarterback legacy in the NFL. Luck was ceaselessly compared to Manning. So much so that his bust might as well have already been bronzed in Canton before he ever took a snap.

There was such an unflappable expectation that Luck would be the next Manning that his place among the NFL’s all-time great quarterbacks was being discussed before his third season. It’s because we loved the narrative — all of us. The notion that the Colts could seamlessly transition from Manning to Luck seemed so innately unfair to non-Colts fans that the system almost seemed rigged. We haven’t seen such a serendipitous circumstance in sports since the San Antonio Spurs were gifted Tim Duncan in the 1997 NBA Draft to solidify their big man succession plans when David Robinson would eventually retire.

That mythos of legacy overshadowed everything when it came to Andrew Luck. It caused us to gloss over his mounting injuries, the frustrations of Colts fans and the very real possibility that the narrative built in our minds would never see its third act. It also ignored the reality that Luck, who had always been pragmatic in his decision making, might value something more than playing in the NFL.

“For the last four years I’ve been in this cycle of injury, pain, rehab, injury, pain, rehab. It’s been unceasing and unrelenting, both in-season and off-season and I felt stuck in it. The only way I see out is to no longer play football.” — Andrew Luck

A lot of this is because Luck’s life had been exceedingly fortuitous. That’s not to ignore the hard work and dedication it took for him to reach the NFL, but rather the reality that perhaps the NFL needed Andrew Luck more than he needed it. He was born into a wealthy family — his father, Oliver, was a former NFL quarterback who had since held a variety of executive jobs in sports (general manager in NFL Europe and MLS, athletic director of West Virginia and now commissioner of the XFL). Luck didn’t need to support his family or shoulder the burden of setting them up for future generations. The fact he was such an astoundingly good quarterback was just a bonus.

Luck legitimately loved the game of football, but injuries took that joy away. Thankfully he’d always been looking at life holistically, and never let football define him solely.

This is also a man whose priorities have altered a lot in the last year. Luck married his longtime girlfriend earlier this year, and announced the couple were expecting their first child shortly before training camp. It’s life-altering changes like that which cause you to reassess, and who the hell can fault him for opting to hang it up when your options is retiring from the NFL at age 29 with millions in earnings, with a new family and plenty of time to move to something else?

Every excuse for Luck to keep playing rings hollow when held up against the life he leads. Many would stay for the money or the prestige, but neither have ever been things Andrew Luck has been overtly interested in. Instead, he’s walking away from the game with his health relatively intact, with enough money to ensure his future and opportunities that extend beyond the field.

The #Colts have known that QB Andrew Luck was seriously mulling retiring for at least two weeks. He’s married, he plans to travel the world, and once the love for the game waned, it sounds like he wanted to step away. So, he did.

— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) August 25, 2019

Andrew Luck lived everyone’s dream. Whether that’s playing the NFL or retiring comfortably at age 29. Now he gets to see the world and spend time with his wife and soon-to-be-born baby. Who wouldn’t want to have that be the road map of their life? It might be a surprise to see him walk away, but the signs were always there. All we can say now is “congratulations,” for playing the game and winning — not of football, but life.


Load more
Read full article on: sbnation.com
Live updates: Trump incorrectly claims that coronavirus affects ‘virtually’ no young people
In a March 19 interview, however, Trump acknowledged that “plenty of young people” were affected and admitted that he had downplayed the risks of the virus.
1m
washingtonpost.com
New bills would reopen NY comedy clubs closed during COVID-19 pandemic
It’s time to laugh again. Comedy clubs ordered closed in March during the peak of the coronavirus outbreak haven’t been allowed to reopen — while restaurants and bowling alleys got the OK to to resume operations, albeit with rules limiting capacity to prevent the spread of the killer bug. But bills introduced by Sen. Michael...
9 m
nypost.com
Party City store in Virginia was carrying Confederate costumes
Mother of two young adopted black girls says she was shocked. The chain says it's removing the items from its shelves
cbsnews.com
Former Mueller Prosecutor Says Russia Investigation, Cowed by Trump Threats, “Could Have Done More”
The Russia investigation was deeply influenced by fear of being shut down.
slate.com
The Fall Surge Is Here
And what else you need to know today.
nytimes.com
California wildfire now "bigger than the city of Denver"
The fire was fueled by vegetation that hadn't burned in decades and pushed by erratic winds
cbsnews.com
Free college, guaranteed income: State, local officials steer coronavirus aid money toward liberal priorities
The CARES Act provides $139 billion in payments to states and local governments. Those payments have funded things like increased police budgets to offset coronavirus costs and rent and utility assistance for struggling residents.
foxnews.com
John Lennon’s killer reportedly apologizes to Yoko Ono for ‘despicable’ act
Mark David Chapman, who killed John Lennon in 1980, has apologized to the famed singer’s wife Yoko Ono — describing his crime as “despicable” and saying he “deserves” the death penalty, according to a report. The 65-year-old — who was denied parole on Aug. 19 — gunned the 40-year-old Beatles star down as he and...
nypost.com
Man Shoots Himself in Groin While Showing Off His Gun In Supermarket Checkout Line
Nicholas J. Ellingford mistakenly pulled the trigger while placing the pistol back into the waistband of his pants, police in Lincoln City, Oregon, said.
newsweek.com
California Fire Map, Update as Bobcat Blaze 'Continues to Advance,' Burns Over 100,000 Acres
Over 7,900 California wildifres have burned more than 3.6 million acres of the state this year to date.
newsweek.com
AP Top Stories September 22 A
Here's the latest for Tuesday September 22nd: Tropical Storm Beta reaches Texas coast; Fire forces more evacuations near Los Angeles; More possible allegations for ricin suspect; Trump meets possible Supreme Court candidate.       
usatoday.com
Coronavirus updates: Hollywood unions, studios reach return-to-work deal; US nears 200K deaths; 3 NFL coaches fined for not wearing masks
Hollywood unions, studios reach return-to-work deal. Two new studies examine virus spread on long flights. U.S. nears 200K deaths. Latest on COVID-19.       
usatoday.com
An entire village lost its broadband at the same time every day for 18 months. Now we know why
For 18 months, residents of a village in Wales have been mystified as to why their broadband internet crashed every morning.
edition.cnn.com
NFL power rankings: Ravens replace Chiefs for No. 1 spot after Week 2
Baltimore's impressive 2-0 start moves them ahead of listless Kansas City heading into Week 3 Monday night showdown.        
usatoday.com
NFL power rankings 3.0: Raiders and NFC West teams skyrocket while Vikings sink
SportsPulse: Week 2 was filled with fantastic finishes, demoralizing injuries and drama. We put a bow on the week and reveal our latest power rankings with our biggest risers and fallers.       
usatoday.com
How Old Is Brandon Flowers? Fans Shocked by Singer's Youthful Looks
The Killers returned to television screens Monday night for the Monday Night Football playing the halftime show on a rooftop above the Las Vegas strip.
newsweek.com
NFL power rankings after Week 2
Here is how the 32 NFL teams stand following Week 2 of the 2020 season. The Baltimore Ravens move into the top spot.        
usatoday.com
On This Day: 22 September 1999
Diana Ross was arrested at London's Heathrow Airpiott. (Sept. 22)       
usatoday.com
An autistic girl eats only one food. Here’s what happened when stores sold out of it.
People started scouring their pantries and offering up the SpaghettiOs from their kitchen shelves. Friends and even strangers brought over hundreds of cans of it.
washingtonpost.com
NFL Week 3 power rankings: Chiefs, Ravens keep top spots ahead of Monday night clash
The Seahawks, Titans and Packers round out the top five.
washingtonpost.com
LinkedIn ranks Better.com, DoorDash among the best-emerging startups in 2020
LinkedIn released on Tuesday its list of 2020's top startups, highlighting emerging and growing industries amid the COVID-19 pandemic.       
usatoday.com
Why does 5G Matter in Developing Countries? | Opinion
In today's global economy, especially one in upheaval thanks to the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) cover up of the COVID-19 outbreak, secure and fast telecommunications networks are essential to a nation's prosperity.
newsweek.com
Jessie James Decker’s Fried Breakfast Tacos
foxnews.com
The Great Liberal Reckoning Has Begun
The death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ends an incredible legal career, one that advanced gender equality and inspired millions. RBG, as she became popularly known, was, like Thurgood Marshall before her, one of the handful of justices who, through their work as lawyers fighting for justice, can truly be said to have earned their spot on the judicial throne. But the outpouring of grief that has followed her death is not just for the passing of a revered figure in American law but also for the end of an important force in American society: the liberal faith in the Supreme Court.[Read: What Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death means for America]This faith is more recent than many people recognize. A century ago, the biggest critics of the federal judiciary were on the left, and for good reason. For most of its history, the Supreme Court was the most conservative of the three branches of government, consistently blocking, or at least delaying, efforts at social, political, and economic reform. From Dred Scott and Plessy v. Ferguson, in which the Court upheld the subordination of racial minorities, to Lochner, which denied the government the ability to regulate much of economic life, the Court epitomized what William F. Buckley would later identify as the conservative credo: the impulse to “stand athwart history, yelling Stop.” By the Progressive Era and the Great Depression, it was widely held that the Supreme Court could only hinder, not help, the cause of reform.But then, for a few decades, everything changed. The fundamental reason was politics: Over his 12-year presidency, Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a record eight new justices, nearly an entire Supreme Court’s worth, two of whom—the liberal icons Hugo Black and William O. Douglas—served into the 1970s. The context changed as well: The federal government’s massive expansion during the New Deal and World War II transformed both elite and popular understandings of the Constitution. This change was so profound that Dwight Eisenhower, the first Republican president elected after FDR, appointed the two justices, Earl Warren and William Brennan, who would later lead the Court to its liberal zenith. These were the decades of Brown v. Board of Education, of the removal of religion from public schools, of the expansion of free speech and the rights of criminal defendants. In these decades the Court was a true partner in the political branches’ attempt to move the country forward.Richard Nixon began the Supreme Court’s shift back to the right, appointing conservatives like Warren Burger, Lewis Powell, and William Rehnquist. Liberals still won a few important victories—most notably 1973’s Roe v. Wade—but since 1969 Republican presidents have appointed 14 justices. Democrats have appointed only four. The past half century of American constitutional law is defined, more than anything else, by this simple fact.From today’s vantage point the fragility of the mid-century liberal judicial victories is abundantly clear. The Supreme Court repeatedly retreated from its promise of sweeping change. Brown repudiated the notorious “separate but equal” doctrine that justified Jim Crow segregation, but when, a year later, the Court was asked to enforce its initial ruling, it meekly held that southern states should desegregate public schools “with all deliberate speed.” Determined southern officials ran circles around cautious federal courts, and desegregation did not begin in earnest until the passage of federal civil-rights legislation in the mid-1960s. This story has played out over and over again. Criminal procedure has become steadily less friendly to criminal defendants over the past 50 years. And Roe’s strict limits on government regulation of abortion were replaced by Planned Parenthood v. Casey’s far laxer “undue burden” test, under which abortion rights have weakened to such an extent that many scholars view Roe as having already been essentially overruled.[Elizabeth Wade: My abortion before Roe v. Wade]While the Supreme Court was under-delivering on its promises, liberal elites were devoting much of their intellectual and emotional resources to the Court, hoping against hope that an appeal to the swing justice will eke out a 5–4 victory for this or that liberal cause. Lawyers and scholars spent a decade trying to bring Anthony Kennedy into the fold, citing his landmark rulings on gay rights and wartime civil liberties as evidence of an imminent conversion to the liberal cause. Yet all the while, Kennedy kept adding to his deeply conservative voting record, a legacy he made sure to preserve by retiring in 2018, thereby allowing a Republican to appoint his successor. Lately focus has turned to John Roberts, in the hope that his commitment to the Supreme Court as an institution will moderate his otherwise-conservative legal positions. And while Roberts, like Kennedy before him, has occasionally voted with the liberals—such as in upholding the Affordable Care Act and ruling against the Trump administration in several important cases last term—the Court’s march to the right continues.The choice to focus on courts has had its most fateful results with abortion, in which the lion’s share of liberal organizational energy has gone into desperate, rear-guard defenses of judicially granted abortion rights. Despite the work of groups like Planned Parenthood and NARAL, anti-abortion-rights advocates have captured statehouses in red states and many purple ones, with one-third of the more than 1,000 abortion restrictions since Roe passed in just the past decade. Roe failed to create a durable political consensus in favor of abortion rights, as occurred over the same period in Western Europe, where abortion rights were secured by legislatures rather than courts. This failure has been one of the key criticisms of Roe from pro-choice advocates, and RBG herself criticized Roe’s sweeping reach on these grounds in a 1985 essay, noting, “The political process was moving in the early 1970s, not swiftly enough for advocates of quick, complete change, but majoritarian institutions were listening and acting. Heavy-handed judicial intervention was difficult to justify and appears to have provoked, not resolved, conflict.”If the Supreme Court has proved itself, time and time again, to be unwilling or incapable of advancing the liberal conception of justice, why have so many liberals, for so long, let themselves be victims of judicial gaslighting? Part of it is that the Warren and early Burger Courts painted a vivid, alluring picture of what justice by judiciary could look like. And even if liberals understood, deep down, that those two decades were an aberration in American legal history, the Court has given them just enough victories since then to keep the dream alive. For lawyers and law professors, there is also the simple matter of professional vanity: If the Supreme Court is the vanguard of American justice, then judges, and thus the lawyers who argue before them and the scholars who analyze (and, when necessary, chastise) them, are the nation’s most important profession—the priests and elders of the civic religion that is American constitutionalism.[Leah Litman: Progressives’ Supreme Court victories will be fleeting]Fundamentally, though, many liberals loved the Supreme Court for the same reason they loved the law: a vision of universal harmony and justice brought about by reason and persuasion, not the brute forces of political power. Victory in the political arena is always incomplete and uncertain, not to mention grubby. Politics appeals to our baser instincts of greed and fear and competition—which, of course, is why it is so powerful. By contrast, law—whether through “neutral principles” or “reasoned elaboration” or elaborate moral theories, to name a few of the core organizing ideas of 20th-century legal theory—holds out the promise of something objective, something True. To win in the court of the Constitution is to have one’s view enshrined as just, not only for today but with the promise of all time.But eventually liberals lost faith that the Court would interpret the Constitution in their favor. What started as a trickle of disillusionment grew throughout the 1980s and ’90s and became a torrent when Roberts became chief justice in 2005 and led the conservative wing to undermine a number of liberal legal priorities, from gun control to campaign-finance law to voting rights. Although many liberal lawyers still dutifully fight in federal court to protect rights where they can, they do so with the increasing understanding that they are simply delaying the inevitable. And legal scholars have gradually given up on the Court as a guarantor of constitutional values, advancing theories of popular constitutionalism or progressive federalism to serve as a counterweight to the Court’s conservative transformation. Whatever was left of the Court’s sacred aura as above partisan politics was ripped away by Mitch McConnell’s denial of a vote to Merrick Garland in 2016 and the bitterness of the confirmation hearings over Brett Kavanaugh two years later.The clearest sign that many liberals are giving up their remaining idealism about the Court is that, for many moderate Democrats (not to mention those on the progressive left), court packing has gone from a fringe theory to not just a viable option but a moral imperative if Joe Biden wins in November and the Democrats take back the Senate. Court packing is straightforwardly constitutional—the Court’s size fluctuated before the Civil War, and its current composition of nine justices is set by statute. But adding justices in retribution for the perfidy of Senate Republicans would require taking a wholly instrumental view of the Court—just another veto point in America’s groaning vetocracy, a super-legislature subject to the same politics as Congress or the White House. It’s a truth that many historians and political scientists have understood for a long time but that many lawyers are only beginning to accept. And it’s a hard, disenchanting truth.The end of the liberal love of the courts will not, of course, be the end of liberals’ fight over them. Liberals will continue to work to get their judges on the Supreme Court and the lower courts. They will champion court decisions that go their way and will explore limiting the judiciary’s powers when it rules against them. Liberals will, in short, act more like conservatives, whose disillusionment with the mid-century Court freed them to view the judicial branch as an instrument of political power and to be unembarrassed by an explicit effort to staff it with the ideologically reliable, just as political parties choose their candidates. This realpolitik approach to judicial nominations is the reason for the Republican Party’s stunning success in reshaping the federal bench, and it is one that liberals will have no choice but to adopt themselves if they want to fight back.In time, liberals may yet win the battle over the federal courts, but any victory will be bittersweet, because in their hearts they will know that the lofty dream is dead. Law is no savior from politics; it is only a temporary reprieve from the struggle between powers over power. Battle is coming. The question is: Do liberals still remember how to fight? Because conservatives certainly do.
theatlantic.com
'The Dark Crystal': Why Has Netflix Canceled 'Age of Resistance'?
"The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance" has become the latest show to be canceled by Netflix after only one season—though its creators have hinted it could return in another form.
newsweek.com
As Stimulus Checks Stall, 8.7 Million At Risk of Losing Out on Support
Those that do not file tax returns or receive federal benefits may miss out on stimulus checks, according to a government report, which looked at the $2.6 trillion that was passed in emergency coronavirus support.
newsweek.com
Power Up: Republicans say Supreme Court vote timing could energize base – or risk the Senate majority
Holding a vote before or after Election Day could make a political difference.
washingtonpost.com
5 things to know for September 22: Coronavirus, SCOTUS, China, Navalny, Botswana
Here's what else you need to know to Get Up to Speed and On with Your Day.
edition.cnn.com
The difficult choice about hiring a tutor for your children
Pawan Dhingra writes that in the face of extended hybrid or remote schooling, many parents are entertaining the idea of hiring a tutor to ensure their children do not fall behind in classes. But, parents need to consider if this is the right decision for their child.
edition.cnn.com
After injury-riddled Week 2, here are the 5 NFL teams most affected by the injury bug
Injuries are ubiquitous in the NFL. But after a rash of them in Week 2's games, some teams are dealing with the fallout more than others.        
usatoday.com
Shannon Bream: Upcoming SCOTUS battle likely to be 'much worse' than Kavanaugh confirmation
The battle over the latest Supreme Court vacancy will probably be "much worse" than Justice Brett Kavanaugh's grueling confirmation process in 2018, Fox News chief legal correspondent and "Fox News @ Night" host Shannon Bream said Tuesday.
foxnews.com
Race to save hundreds of stranded pilot whales as death toll tops 90
Scores of volunteers are struggling to dislodge almost 200 of the animals from a sandbar off the Australian island of Tasmania.
cbsnews.com
Michigan tourism businesses worry about cold weather and COVID spikes
One restaurant owner said she's had trouble lately getting people to comply with orders to wear masks."People are just starting to get sick of it, and it's getting kind of hard again," Heidi Gesiakowski said.
cbsnews.com
'Division 2' Update 1.27 Adds Title Update 11, Backfire & More: Patch Notes
"The Division 2" Title Update 11 kicks off a new season with the Summit mode and a bunch of new Exotics. Read all about them in the patch notes.
newsweek.com
Mike Bloomberg raises $16 million to allow former felons to vote in Florida
The effort to help elect Democrat Joe Biden is targeted at convicted Black and Hispanic voters.
washingtonpost.com
Latinos are disproportionately getting sick, dying of coronavirus, exacerbating historic inequalities
The novel coronavirus is devastating Latino communities across the United States, exacerbating historic inequalities in areas where residents, many of whom are “essential” workers, struggle to access health care. More than 36,500 Latinos have died of the virus, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed by The Washington Post.
washingtonpost.com
Letters to the Editor: Expanding the Supreme Court is the ugliest kind of politics. Don't do it, Democrats
If the Democrats were in power, they'd be trying to ram through a replacement for the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
latimes.com
How Ruth Bader Ginsburg is being memorialized in cartoons
Even political cartoonists, so trained in drawing on deadline, can be caught cold by breaking news.
washingtonpost.com
Letters to the Editor: Stop trying to figure out Trump's base. Beating him is all that matters
Efforts to understand the president's supporters have not been effective at defeating him. Instead, the focus should be on turning out Democratic voters.
latimes.com
An around-the-clock virtual protest lifts voices of those unable to take to the streets
Public Public Address founders hope the outlet offers an opportunity to protest for a group that’s been accustomed to sitting out.
washingtonpost.com
'The Ultimate Fighter' winner Brad Katona signs with EMC, set for bantamweight title tilt
"The Ultimate Fighter" Season 27 winner Brad Katona has signed with European promotion EMC, and will challenge for championship gold on his promotional debut.       Related StoriesMarkus Perez dares Khamzat Chimaev to step in after Roldofo Vieira withdraws from Oct. 10 fightUFC 253 'Embedded,' No. 1: Leaving Las VegasPatricio Freire acquires visa, anticipates overdue Bellator showdown with Pedro Carvalho in late 2020 
usatoday.com
It’s too early for NFL teams to panic — except maybe for these five
Five big takeaways from NFL Week 2, including panic time for these preseason playoff contenders.
washingtonpost.com
Editorial: A better way to help Californians survive wildfires: Focus on homes, not trees
Fire safety experts are increasingly focusing on houses instead of forests as they explore how to improve safety in an era of destructive wildfires.
latimes.com
Candace Cameron Bure on her ‘Full House’ legacy, being religious in Hollywood and that “PDA” photo
"Fuller House" actress Candace Cameron Bure talked about filming for Hallmark during the pandemic and the weird reason she was in the news last week.
washingtonpost.com
The numbers to know on the Supreme Court fight
Senate Republicans can only afford so many defectors to confirm Trump's nominee
washingtonpost.com
Letters to the Editor: A subpar COVID-19 vaccine approval won't happen, no matter what Trump says
Teams of career scientists are bound by laws and regulations, not President Trump's wishes, when it comes to a coronavirus vaccine.
latimes.com
How to install the proper venting in a double-bowl sink in a kitchen island
ASK THE BUILDER | In situations where you simply can’t install a traditional vent pipe that is hidden behind the plumbing fixtures, the best solution is a traditional loop vent.
washingtonpost.com
Endorsement: Put Mark Ridley-Thomas back on the L.A. City Council
Council District 10 and the city as a whole would benefit from Ridley-Thomas' experience and focus on systemic reform.
latimes.com