Generally
General
698
unread news
unread news (Demo user)
‘Best friend’ accused of kidnapping Texas mom Heidi Broussard charged with her murder
Authorities believe Fieramusca planned to pass off Broussard’s newborn as her own.
6 m
nypost.com
Republicans' 75% problem on impeachment witnesses
Two days from a giant vote over whether witnesses will be allowed to be called in the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, Republicans are faced with a stark problem: The voting public really likes the idea.
9 m
edition.cnn.com
Climate change is threatening world’s wine supply
Rising global temperatures could wipe out 85 percent of the world's wine-growing regions, according to a new study.
9 m
nypost.com
Meghan Markle’s best friend Misha Nonoo pregnant with first child
And she redesigned the Duchess's "husband shirt" for maternity.
nypost.com
Actors’ union issues new standards for sex and nude scenes
LOS ANGELES — The union that represents actors and television performers issued a series of standards and guidelines Wednesday for crew members who supervise scenes involving sex and nudity. The goal is to combat on-set sexual harassment. The framework announced by the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists provides a common set...
nypost.com
How to talk someone out of bigotry
Hundreds of protesters gathered in New York City after the election of President Trump on November 11, 2016. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images These scientists keep proving that reducing prejudice is possible. It’s just not easy. What does it take to divert someone away from prejudice and toward greater acceptance of others in order to build support for progressive causes? “Deep canvassing,” a relatively new technique, is showing promise — and backed by rigorous testing from researchers and activists in the field. One such activist is David Topping, who decided, along with other LGBTQ activists and allies, to try deep canvassing in Massachusetts in 2018, when transgender rights were on the ballot. Massachusetts voters could choose to keep or throw out a law that banned discrimination based on gender identity. Topping, who’s gender nonbinary, and others, went door to door. If they met a voter who wanted to get rid of the law, they wouldn’t call them out for prejudice. Instead, they did something more radical: They listened, nonjudgmentally, and began a conversation. It’s not easy to confront people whose votes would seek to hurt you, and then try to change their minds. “I came out two years ago now, and one of the hardest things for me has been talking with folks who don’t understand [gender identity], and not immediately writing someone off because they don’t immediately get it,” Topping says. Topping calls this “giving them grace.” It’s a powerful idea: “Giving grace ... means being able to hear someone say something that can be hurtful, and trying to think about how to have a real conversation and connect with them.” Massachusetts voters chose to protect trans rights, and Topping believes deep canvassing helped. “This tactic is the only thing that has been proven to work on nondiscrimination, so without it we wouldn’t have been able to win,” Topping says. Suzanne Kreiter/The Boston Globe via Getty Images Families with transgender children celebrate the new public accommodations bill at the Massachusetts State House on July 11, 2016. Giving grace. Listening to a political opponent’s concerns. Finding common humanity. In the year 2020, these seem like radical propositions. But when it comes to changing minds, they work. New research tells us changing minds with deep canvassing is not impossible, it’s just very hard. The payoffs are small and incremental, but they are real. A 2016 study in Science proved it was possible. And now, a new peer-reviewed study — a series of three placebo-controlled field experiments — soon to be published in American Political Science Review, replicates the findings and gives us new insights into the conditions for lasting opinion change and reductions in prejudice. The new research shows that if you want to change someone’s mind, you need to have patience with them, ask them to reflect on their own lives, and listen. It’s not about calling people out or labeling them fill-in-the-blank phobic. Which makes it feel like a big departure from a lot of the current political dialogue. “I think in today’s world, many communities have a call-out culture,” says David Broockman, a UC Berkeley political scientist who has run these experiments with Josh Kalla, a political scientist at Yale University. “Twitter is obviously full of the notion that what we should do is condemn those who disagree with us. What we can now say experimentally, the key to the success of these conversations is doing the exact opposite of that.” Deep canvassing, explained Over the past few years, deep canvassing has been adopted by some progressive activist groups looking to not only change minds when it comes to policies on immigration and LGBTQ rights, but also to reduce prejudice toward these groups. In 2016, Broockman and Kalla showed that a 10-minute “deep canvas” conversation could reduce transgender prejudice for at least three months. Topping and dozens of other canvassers were a part of that effort. It was an important study: Not only has social science found very few strategies that work, in experiments, to change minds on issues of prejudice, but even fewer tests of those strategies have occurred in the real world. Typically, the conversations begin with the canvasser asking the voter for their opinions on a topic, like abortion access, immigration, or LGBTQ rights. Canvassers (who may or may not be a member of the impacted community) listen nonjudgmentally. They don’t say if they are pleased or hurt by the response. They are supposed “to appear genuinely interested in hearing the subject ruminate on the question,” as Broockman and Kalla’s latest study instructions read. The canvassers then ask if the voters know anyone in the affected community, and ask if they relate to the person’s story. If they don’t, and even if they do, they’re asked a question like, “When was a time someone showed you compassion when you really needed it?” to get them to reflect on their own experience when they might have felt something similar to the people in the marginalized community. Meanwhile, the canvassers share their own stories, too: about being an immigrant, about being a member of the LGBTQ community, or about just knowing people who are. (You can read the full deep canvassing script here on page 47.) It’s a type of conversation that’s closer to what a psychotherapist might have with a patient than a typical political argument. (One clinical therapist I showed it to said it sounded a bit like “motivational interviewing,” a technique used to help clients work through ambivalent feelings.) It’s not about listing facts or calling people out on their prejudicial views. It’s about sharing and listening, all the while nudging people to be analytical and think about their shared humanity with marginalized groups. It’s also quite a departure from standard political canvassing. Typically, in a political canvass, an activist might list a bunch of facts or statistics about why the voter should support their cause. Not so with deep canvassing. Instead of pelting voters with facts, “we ask open-ended questions and then we listen,” Dave Fleischer, the LGBTQ rights organizer who developed the technique, told me in 2016. “And then we continue to ask open-ended questions based on what they just told us.” The idea is that people learn lessons more durably when they come to the conclusion themselves, not when someone “bitch-slaps you with a statistic,” Fleischer said. It is stories, not facts, that are most compelling to people when they’re changing their minds. Here’s a 2015 video example of deep canvassing. It’s of a real voter and a canvasser from the Leadership LAB, a program of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, which spearheaded this canvassing method after losing the 2008 Proposition 8 ballot initiative in California. The woman in the video starts off ambivalent on transgender issues. But through deep canvassing, the activist is able to turn her around. Specifically, the canvasser asks the voter to recall a time when he or she was discriminated against. Toward the end of the conversation, the canvasser nudges the voter into thinking about how that experience can relate to the plight of transgender people. The idea is that people learn lessons more durably when they come to the conclusions on their own. In the video above, notice how the voter starts to come around on the issue when the canvasser asks if she’s ever been on the receiving end of discrimination. She talks about being picked on at work and feeling different. He responds by telling his own story of being discriminated against for being gay. It’s a real heart-to-heart between strangers. And in that moment he points out that a transgender nondiscrimination law would help people who feel discriminated against at school or work. ”Oh, okay, that makes a lot of sense,” she says. The video ends like this. “I would totally vote in favor,” she says of a transgender protection law. “It’s only right. Let a person be who they are.” Testing deep canvassing in the real world In the new study, Kalla and Broockman put deep canvassing through a more rigorous test. Namely: It’s larger, and it targets more issues, both trans rights and policies protective of undocumented immigrants. The new research also tries to identify the secret ingredient that makes deep canvassing work, and whether versions of it that occur over the phone or through video prompts can be useful as well. (These methods may make it easier to scale up in a bigger campaign.) The first of the three experiments was pretty much a replication of the 2016 study, but on the topic of rights for undocumented immigrants. In it, canvassers in three areas — central Tennessee; Fresno, California; and Orange County, California — went door to door and interacted with 2,374 voters in these communities during the runup to the 2018 midterm elections. “All three places are experiencing demographic change, with a growing and diversifying population of immigrant residents,” says Kim Serrano, the messaging research project manager at the California Immigrant Policy Center. “Tennessee and the Central Valley have been the sites of large-scale workplace raids by ICE in recent years,” she says, “and various cities in Orange County have attempted to ‘opt out’ of the California Values Act.” That’s a state law that limits the collaboration between local law enforcement and federal immigration enforcement. The experiment, like all of them in the study, was run a bit like a drug trial: The voters were randomly assigned (before the canvassers even knocked on their doors) to either receive the full deep canvassing conversation treatment; a watered-down version where the voters and canvassers don’t exchange personal stories with one another; or a “placebo condition,” where voters were engaged in a conversation that had nothing to do with immigration. The voters were followed up with by survey one week, a month, and then several months after being contacted by the canvassers. After the canvassing, 29 percent of the people in the placebo condition said they strongly supported policies inclusive of undocumented immigrants. In the full-conversation condition, 33 percent were in support. The effect was durable, too: Three to six months after the conversation, voters who shared their feelings with canvassers in this manner also reported less prejudice toward undocumented immigrants. The watered-down intervention without the two-way exchange didn’t move anyone to support undocumented immigrants. That’s a new finding. “Now we can show experimentally that when you take away the two-way nature of the conversation, the effects go away,” Broockman says. It’s this “nonjudgmental exchanging of narratives” that Broockman and Kalla think is the key ingredient in how deep canvassing works. Keep in mind the media environment the canvassers were working in. Immigration — particularly that of asylum seekers — loomed over the 2018 elections. In the runup, conservative news outlets were blaring headlines about a scary immigrant “caravan” marching North through Mexico to the US southern border. President Trump called it “an invasion,” apparently hoping that by raising xenophobic, dehumanizing fears, about non-white immigrants as he had in 2016, he’d help his party win seats in Congress. In this graph, Broockman and Kalla break down how the canvassing moved the needle on particular questions: whether the government should provide attorneys for undocumented immigrants in legal proceedings; whether the US should grant legal status to people who were brought to the US illegally as children; whether they support deporting all undocumented immigrants; and whether undocumented immigrants should live in fear of daily deportation. Stanford University Broockman points out that this graph shows the impacts of deep canvassing among all people who came to the door to answer the canvasser’s questions. It includes those who immediately shut the door in the canvasser’s face. “The numbers get a bit bigger when you just focus on people who actually entered into the conversation,” he says. Among those who started the conversation, there was a 7 percentage point increase for granting legal status to people brought to the US as children, he says, for example. “This is not just a story of pushing on an open door and taking people who are already Democrats and they just needed a small push,” Broockman adds. “Even as Trump was talking about the caravan, we see that Republicans in our study are moving.” Why and when does deep canvassing work? The two other experiments in the study targeted transphobia. In these, researchers included conditions to see whether the conversations could be effective if conducted over the phone (they were, but it was slightly less effective). In another condition, the canvassers didn’t share their own story, but instead played a video of someone suffering through prejudice and then based the conversation around that. That also worked. It’s worth noting that some of the results were less strong than those Broockman and Kalla reported in their 2016 paper. The impacts these conversations had on feelings of prejudice, Broockman admits, are about a third as strong. “When working with new groups, new staff, on a new issue and at bigger scale, I think it’s natural to expect smaller effects,” he says. (It’s hard, he says, to directly compare the two papers, though, since the 2016 effort focused a bit more on combating prejudice, and this one more so on policy.) Emile Bruneau, a neuroscientist who studies intergroup conflict at the University of Pennsylvania and was not involved in the canvassing experiments, tells me in an email it is “so promising to see an intervention, any intervention, that has a lasting effect on big social issues.” What’s missing here, she says, is a theoretical understanding for whythe change is occurring. “Without that theoretical understanding, it’s difficult to generalize and use the approach in other settings,” Bruneau says. It does seem as though the two-way nature of the conversations is essential for the canvassing technique to work. But why? Broockman and Kalla aren’t completely sure. Their main hypothesis is that it works because it’s not threatening. People are resistant to changing their mind during an argument, the hypothesis goes, because it threatens their self-image. Sharing narratives gets around that: The persuasion happens because in talking about themselves, the voters realize a more tolerant attitude is consistent with their self-image. Broockman says they didn’t set out to find the exact mechanism. “That is just not what we are trying to do here,” he says. Social science experiments are usually conducted on college campuses, in a lab, in contrived scenarios. There’s plenty of work that offers some possible mechanisms by which opinions change. But this work isn’t about that. “One way you could think about our study is as an effort to try to ... use the insights of lab studies in real-world settings,” he says. (Also worth noting: Deep canvassing has only been tested out with progressive causes. Could it be used to wage conservative culture wars? Possibly. Or for issues like the acceptance of genetically modified foods? That’s not known.) There’s also the question: Is it worth the effort? The truth is, there’s not much out there in scientific literature on what can change a voter’s mind. In 2018, Kalla and Broockman published a meta-analysis of 49 experiments that were designed to test whether voters are persuadable by conventional means: phone calls, television ads, traditional canvassing, and so on. In aggregate, it turns out these tactics don’t work at all. The effects of most efforts to change people’s minds on an issue, if successful at all, tend to fade over time. The impact of television ads, in particular, can fade in just a week. Deep canvassing, it appears from the research, has an effect that can last for several months. “These deep conversations, I suspect, may be more cost-effective in the long run because the impacts are durable,” Serrano says. And while the effects may be small, only moving opinion a handful of percentage points among those canvassed may be worth it, too. “I’m a campaign person, you’d do anything for 3.5 points,” says Fran Hutchins, the deputy director of the Equality Federation, who worked on deep canvassing efforts reported in the new study. “Think of any of our recent elections, nobody is winning these things by 10 or 20 points. It always comes down to just a few points.” Do we need more of these conversations in our lives? There’s a smaller finding nestled in Broockman and Kalla’s new paper, one that might not make headlines, but it’s something worth thinking about. In the experiment on immigration, Broockman and Kalla found that 78 percent of all the people who came to the door when the canvasser rang ended up staying for the entire conversation. And 75 percent of the people who start the conversations with the canvassers share a story about their own lives. “Those basic numbers tell you something about just how willing most Americans are to have an open conversation with a stranger about these ostensibly divisive issues,” Broockman says. It’s a reminder that our political opponents aren’t always as rigid or ideologically severe as they appear in our minds. In his work, Bruneau finds that political partisans have a skewed view of how they think their opponents think of them. Which is to say: Republicans assume Democrats dislike them more than they actually do and vice versa. And it’s this meta-perception, Bruneau finds, which then fuels ongoing conflict and dehumanization. The activists and scientists I spoke to for this story all agree that you can’t change everyone’s minds. Topping says, in their experience, deep canvassing works best on people who might be concerned about an issue like transgender people in bathrooms but have never really talked through their feelings. That’s likely a lot of people. In the age of Trump, there’s a compelling push to call a spade a spade. When we see racist behavior, we should call it racist and not be euphemistic by calling it “racially charged.” Arguably there’s a time and place for calling people out, particularly when it comes to powerful, influential people. But maybe not when it comes to our neighbors. Broockman says this research can at least lend ordinary people a new script when dealing with people in their lives who hold prejudicial opinions. That’s refreshing and useful. “This kind of conversation helps me talk to family members who aren’t totally there yet [on accepting their identity],” Topping says. “It has taught me patience, and taught me to see people from the most positive view that I can.”
vox.com
Juice Wrld's music to get posthumous release
Juice Wrld's family says it plans to share his unreleased music.
edition.cnn.com
Nadal hails Thiem work after Grand Slam record bid dashed
Rafa Nadal paid the ultimate respect to his Australian Open conqueror Dominic Thiem on Wednesday, seeing something of himself in the hard-working Austrian after falling short in a quarter-final classic under the lights on Rod Laver Arena.
reuters.com
Face It: The Economy Under Trump Is Great | Opinion
The only reason the far left calls this economy "bad" is because it shows people do not need the government as a mediating institution to succeed.
newsweek.com
U.S. sees no imposed change to 'status quo' around Al-Aqsa mosque
A U.S. proposal for Israeli-Palestinian peace does not call for imposing any change to prayer arrangements around a key Jerusalem mosque compound which was also the site of ancient Jewish temples, a U.S. official said on Wednesday.
reuters.com
Urgen comentario público contra el aumento de tarifas de USCIS, así puede participar
El periodo de comentario se extiende hasta el 10 de febrero.
latimes.com
Giuliani Slams John Bolton -- 'Classic Backstabber'
In a sit-down interview with CBS "This Morning," Rudy Giuliani, personal legal counsel for President Donald Trump, sounded off on former National Security Advisor John Bolton amid reports of Bolton's leaked manuscript claiming Trump wanted to withhold aid from Ukraine.
breitbart.com
Maryland Man Finds Body of Previous Resident Inside House He Bought at Auction
Police do not suspect foul play after a woman was found inside a District Heights home.
newsweek.com
MoviePass files bankruptcy liquidation, may owe money to 12,000 subscribers
Any hopes of a MoviePass comeback have ended. MoviePass and its parent company filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation on Tuesday.      
usatoday.com
Bob Shane, last surviving original member of Kingston Trio, dead at 85
Bob Shane, the last surviving original member of the Kingston Trio, has died.
foxnews.com
FDA warns Purell to stop claiming it can prevent Ebola
The language used on the Purell website is vague and could easily be seen as misleading, the FDA argues.
nypost.com
Barstool Sports announces sale to gambling firm Penn National Gaming
Barstool Sports CEO David Portnoy announced they sold a share of their stock to gambling company Penn National Gaming. Chernin Group will retain 36 percent ownership.
nypost.com
Jerry West recalls telling Kobe Bryant not to play for the Clippers, Donald Sterling
NBA legend Jerry West told a story Tuesday on TNT in which he told Kobe Bryant to not join the Clippers when Bryant was a free agent in 2004.       
usatoday.com
El escándalo bancario de Wells Fargo fue aún peor de lo que puede imaginar
Los nuevos cargos del gobierno revelan lo malo que fue el escándalo de Wells Fargo...
latimes.com
Supreme Ruler Putin? Kremlin non-committal on proposed new job description
The Kremlin said on Wednesday that President Vladimir Putin had no view on a proposal that would see his job description change to Supreme Ruler from head of state after a government commission said it was considering the idea.
reuters.com
Did you love the best picture nominees? Did you know you didn't see the whole film?
Reasons for cutting scenes from a movie vary. Here's why 'Little Women,' 'Jojo Rabbit,' 'Parasite' and others didn't keep everything they shot.
latimes.com
How much money should you spend on headphones?
Like with anything, it all comes down to what you're looking for.       
usatoday.com
Joe Biden says he’d want Michelle Obama to be his running mate
Former Vice President Joe Biden expressed his desire to have former First Lady Michelle Obama be his running mate -- something that would be a first in presidential politics.
nypost.com
What's Leaving Hulu in February 2020? All the Titles on Last Call List
Time has officially run out on nearly 30 titles.
newsweek.com
Can you guess which Americans are most into plant-based meat?
An Impossible Whopper at a Burger King in California, 2019. | Photo by Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images A new Gallup poll suggests interest in meat alternatives is broader than you might think 2019 was a great year for plant-based meats. The enthusiastic reception that Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat, and the new wave ofmeat substitutes has received in restaurants and stores suggests there’s a lot of consumers who love the products. But since convincingly meatlike plant-based meat is so new, we still have an incomplete picture of how many Americans are on board. A new set of Gallup polls, released Monday and Tuesday, seeks to fill in some of that picture. The polls ask Americans about their meat consumption and, for the first time ever for Gallup, theirconsumption of plant-based meats. The overall takeaway? Plant-based meats are in fact getting pretty big — though there’s still a cohort of Americans who are unpersuaded. According to the survey, forty-one percentof Americans have tried a plant-based meat product at some point, including half of Americans under age 50. The peoplewho’ve tried plant-based meat come from every demographic category and background: 39 percent of men and 43 percent of women have eaten them (almost statistically indistinguishable numbers); 42 percent of white Americans and 38 percent of nonwhite Americans (also almost statistically indistinguishable). Wealthier Americans are more likely to have given plant-based meat a shot (not surprising, as it’s still more expensive than meat from animals), with 54 percent of people making above $100,000 a year saying so, compared to 31 percent of people making less than $40,000 a year. What stands out in the polling is the broad range of demographics. Instead of just white women, or millennials, expressing their interest in meatless meat, it’s almost everyone. It suggests the industry has succeeded at making the products interesting and compelling to people across the country. There’s still a lot of room for growth for the plant-based meat industry: while 41 percent of Americans have tried their products, 30 percent still say they’re “not familiar at all” with the products. Christina Animashaun/Vox Encouragingly for companies that are hoping to be not just a novelty but an eventual staple purchase, a majority of those who have tried plant-based meat say they’re very likely or somewhat likely to eat plant-based meat products again. (Those numbers look even better for younger respondents, who were generally more positive on plant-based products than older respondents were.) Christina Animashaun/Vox Polling generally shows that about 5 percent of Americans are vegan or vegetarian, a number that has been relatively constant over the last thirty years. There’s no previous polling to look to on plant-based meat eating: this is the first time Gallup has asked Americans these questions. The fact they polled on these topics at all itself reflects the extraordinarily fast rise of plant-based meat in 2019. Why people eat plant-based meat What’s driving the interest in plant-based meat? The other slate of Gallup polls, released Monday, might provide some insight. That set of polls asks Americans about their meat consumption, and finds that 23 percent report cutting back on their meat consumption in the past year. Health, the environment, and animal welfare are all cited as major reasons why. Advocates for plant-based meat argue that they can solve the environmental, and animal welfare issues associated with factory farming (as well as some of the health issues, like antibiotic resistance). Plant-based meat products don’t involve animal cruelty, obviously, and their greenhouse gas footprint is far lower than the greenhouse gas footprint from animal farming. So many of the motivations that drive consumers to attempt to reduce their meat consumption also might be driving the rise of plant based meat (though Gallup didn’t poll the same people about meat consumption as they polled about plant-based meat; the two surveys were conducted separately). It’s worth noting that self-reports are not a very good way of estimating actual meat consumption. While very few Americans claimed to increase their meat consumption last year and nearly one in four claims that they cut back, overall meat consumption in the U.S. increased. While not all statistics are available yet, it looks like a little less than 10 billion land animals will be killed for consumption, more than in 2018 — which was itself more than in 2017. And other surveys have found that questions about our food habits in particular are intensely subject to desirability biases, where people claim they’re cutting back on unhealthy foods and eating more of healthy ones...regardless of whether the facts match. So the Gallup poll should not be taken as telling us too much about consumer eating habits, — but they might say somethingabout consumer aspirational eating habits. It’s probably not true that one in four Americans actually meaningfully cut down on their meat consumption last year, but it’s certainly true that one in four Americans wanted to do so and tried to. That’s certainly a group of people who are very likely to try plant-based meat alternatives. But those Americans make up only 23 percent of the population, while more than that have tried plant-based meat and say they’ll try it again. That suggests plant-based meat doesn’t just appeal to the (sizable) share of Americans who say they are trying to cut down on their meat consumption, but also to many of those who are not. That broad base of interested customers might be the difference between being a niche product and a mainstream one. Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter and we’ll send you a roundup of ideas and solutions for tackling the world’s biggest challenges — and how to get better at doing good. Future Perfect is funded in part by individual contributions, grants, and sponsorships. Learn more here.
vox.com
African-American pastor’s incredible true story leading a KKK member to Christ hits theaters
A former member of the Ku Klux Klan, who was once instructed to kill an African-American pastor, was transformed by their unlikely friendship.
foxnews.com
Trump: Taking John Bolton’s advice would have led to ‘World War Six’
According to Bolton's upcoming book, "The Room Where It Happened," Trump admitted he was pausing military aid to Ukraine until it investigated Joe Biden.
nypost.com
Parents of dead UK teen want to ‘swap’ US diplomat’s wife Anne Sacoolas for Prince Andrew
The British parents of a teenage motorcyclist killed in a crash with a US diplomat’s wife are pushing to get her sent back to the UK — in a proposed swap for Prince Andrew giving evidence to the FBI. US authorities have repeatedly refused to extradite Anne Sacoolas, 42, who claimed diplomatic immunity and returned to...
nypost.com
Trump-Allied Charity Is Holding Events in Black Communities to Give Away Thousands in Envelopes Stuffed With Cash
Organizers say they handed out $25,000 in cash at the first event.
slate.com
Super Bowl LIV: The Tradition and Facts Behind Roman Numerals Explained
Unlike other sporting events, each Super Bowl is identified by a specific number as a bid to avoid confusion.
newsweek.com
Florida police issue Amber Alert for missing newborn last seen at home where 3 women found shot dead
A triple-homicide investigation in southern Florida prompted police Tuesday to issue an Amber Alert for a one-week old baby boy who was last seen at the same Miami-area home three women were found shot dead earlier this week.
foxnews.com
Stunning drone video shows devastation from helicopter crash that killed Kobe Bryant, 8 others
Stunning NTSB drone footage shows a swath of catastrophic devastation from the helicopter crash that killed Kobe Bryant and eight others.        
usatoday.com
Opinion: Donald Trump could take another shot at buying an NFL team
Don't be surprised if Donald Trump tries buy an NFL team. "After the presidency, he'll be looking for his life's hobby," said an associate.       
usatoday.com
Pompeo to Britain: Look again at Huawei 5G decision
The United States on Wednesday urged Britain to rethink its decision to allow China's Huawei a role in 5G networks, cautioning that American information would only be allowed to pass across trusted networks.
reuters.com
Husband charged in nursing student Kelly Owen’s murder on Long Island
The husband of the Long Island nursing student who was found strangled in her home earlier this month has been arrested in connection with the slaying, police and reports said. Michael Owen, 27, of St. James, was charged with murder in the second-degree Tuesday for the Jan. 15 death of 27-year-old South Farmingdale mom Kelly...
nypost.com
Ivanka Trump Reminded of Times Her Father Has Mocked Accents After Criticizing CNN Panel's 'Smug Ridicule' of Trump Supporters
The CNN panel had made fun of President Donald Trump and his supporters, mocking those with southern accents.
newsweek.com
White House weighs ban on flights between China, US amid coronavirus outbreak
Trump administration officials called executives at major US airlines to inform them that a temporary ban on flights to China was on the table.
nypost.com
Dual controversies rack U.K.'s royal family
Prince Andrew is allegedly providing "zero cooperation" in Jeffrey Epstein's U.S. sex trafficking case after claiming he would in a November interview. Alleged victim Virginia Giuffre claims Epstein pressured her into having sex with Andrew when she was 17, which Andrew denies. This latest twist in the case comes just weeks after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made their stunning decision to give up their royal duties and most prestigious titles. The Sunday Times' Roya Nikkhah joins “CBS This Morning” to discuss the two controversies.
cbsnews.com
Trump to Republicans: Don't let Democrats 'play you' on witnesses – live impeachment trial updates
Senators begin up to 16 hours of questions Wednesday in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump after six days of arguments from both sides.       
usatoday.com
More Voters Believe Bernie Sanders Is the Most Honest Candidate Of All Democratic Contenders, Poll Finds
Sanders is also seen by the largest percentage of voters as the candidate who cares the most about people like themselves.
newsweek.com
George H. W. Bush's grandson running for Congress in Texas: President Trump 'has kept his word'
Texas Republican congressional candidate Pierce Bush, 33, said Wednesday that he believes President Trump deserves to be re-elected.
foxnews.com
Why Kerry Washington called Disney chief Robert Iger 'the ultimate Disney princess'
Inducting Cicely Tyson into TV Academy's Hall of Fame, Shonda Rhimes said she "paved a black road through a thick, unyielding white male forest."        
usatoday.com
Stephen Colbert reflects on Kobe Bryant's death, says his dad, 2 brothers died in plane crash
Stephen Colbert did not know Kobe Bryant personally, but he announced on his late-night show on Tuesday that he has a heartbreaking connection to the NBA legend's sudden death.
foxnews.com
McDonald's sees higher 2020 spending on tech, R&D after sales beat
McDonald's Corp beat forecasts with its quarterly sales on Wednesday and said it would spend more on technology and research in 2020, as the world's largest burger chain bets on revamped stores and menu additions to lure more diners and gain market share.
reuters.com
Taiwan’s single-payer system is popular — but it might be in trouble
Doctor Tien Hui-Wen sees a patient at Xiulin Health Center. | Ashley Pon for Vox The US can learn a lot from Taiwan’s 25 years with a single-payer health insurance system. On the east coast of Taiwan, where a small valley meets sharp, green mountains, lies the township of Xiulin. Ithasa few narrow streets. Many houses have corrugated roofs and siding. In this township is a clinic, a building a couple of stories tall with physicians’ offices, X-ray facilities, and a small office for dental care. Dr. Huei-wen Tien works there.She’s a short woman in her late 50s. Her hair has gone white so she’s dyed it bright pink, and she wears an all-black outfit with black ankle boots. Hermotorcycle helmet hasthe word “PUNK” written on the side, and she rides her moped to visit her patients. Today, her trips take her just a few minutes into the township, but some days, she drives hours up into the mountains to treat patients living in very remote areas. In one house, she visits a stroke patient. She checks his blood sugar levels and talks him through some medications. For the patient, all of this care is free. Taiwan has a program that looks a lot like the Medicare-for-all proposal being floated by presidential candidates like Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. It’s called National Health Insurance, and it covers every single person in the country. The Impact is Vox’s podcast about how policy shapes peoples lives. On this episode, Vox policy reporter Dylan Scott walks us through how Taiwan built their single-payer system and what the US can learn from the program. Dylan Scott went to Taiwan with The Impact’s Byrd Pinkerton. They interviewed patients, doctors, government officials, and a researcher with a charming love story. Listen to this episode to hear what they discovered: Dylan learned that the people of Taiwan love their universal health care program that has significantly improved Taiwan’s health outcomes. But he also learned that the entire system could go bankrupt — and soon — if the country doesn’t make dramatic changes. Further listening and reading: Dylan’s piece on Taiwan’s single-payer success story Uwe Reinhardt’s latest book, Priced Out: The Economic and Ethical Costs of American Healthcare Tsung-Mei Cheng wrote a Wall Street Journal opinion piece making the case for a public option Dylan’s piece on the three different kinds of health care plan floated by the Democratic candidates Vox’s guide to where 2020 candidates stand on policy Subscribe to The Impact on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app to automatically get new episodes of the latest season each week.
vox.com
Several storms will impact Northwest with little significant weather elsewhere
A quick moving storm brought snow to parts of the Plains on Tuesday, including over a foot of snow in parts of Southwest Kansas
abcnews.go.com