Tools

Puskás-díj: magyar jelölt is van az év tíz legszebb gólja között

A debreceni Zsóri Dániel ollózására felfigyelt a nemzetközi labdarúgó-szövetség. Az év magyar gólja volt.
Load more
Read full article on: index.hu
‘Monday Night Football’ debut 50 years ago began a TV revolution
The options were limited that night, of course. If you lived in and around New York City, you were actually blessed with what felt like a buffet table of seven television choices. So as 9 o’clock rolled around that Monday night, Sept. 21, 1970, you could tune into “Boom!” a Liz Taylor-Richard Burton drama on...
8 m
nypost.com
How the Beirut explosion was a government failure
And why Lebanon is on the verge of collapse. On August 4, 2020, a massive explosion rocked the port of Beirut, the capital city of Lebanon. A fire had erupted in a warehouse that stored 2,700 metric tons of ammonium nitrate, a highly explosive chemical. The result was one of the largest accidental explosions in history. More than 200 people died and thousands were wounded. The problem though, is it was just the latest catastrophe to occur in Lebanon. Over the past few years the country’s economic has collapsed. The currency has fallen nearly 80 percent in value and unemployment is surging. Thousands of Lebanese have taken to the streets to demand an end to government corruption. Watch this episode of Vox Atlas to understand what the explosion means for Lebanon and why the government is to blame. You can find this video and all of Vox’s videos on YouTube. Subscribe for the latest. Help keep Vox free for all Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world: Contribute today from as little as $3.
vox.com
Donald Trump is really grading himself on a curve on coronavirus
Very soon, the United States will mark a somber milestone: 200,000 Americans will have died from the coronavirus.
edition.cnn.com
Fearless Girl Statue Given Ruth Bader Ginsburg Makeover in Tribute to Supreme Court Justice
The Fearless Girl statue debuted a new look outside New York's Stock Exchange with a white lace collar in homage to Ginsburg's signature fashion piece.
newsweek.com
‘This Is Spinal Tap’ creators reach settlement with studio over income
The creators sued the studios in 2016 for $400 million alleging fraud and claiming they’d been stiffed on proceeds.
nypost.com
College Football Schedule: Latest AP Rankings, How to Watch Week 4 Games
Week 4 of the college football season marks the beginning of the SEC season, with Alabama, Georgia and defending champion LSU all in action.
newsweek.com
Trump Suggests Ginsburg's Final Statement Was Faked By Adam Schiff, Schumer, Pelosi
"I don't know if she said that or that was written out by Adam Schiff and Schumer and Pelosi, I'd be more inclined to the second you don't know, it came out of the wind, it sounds so beautiful. But that sounds like a Schumer deal or maybe Pelosi or shifty Schiff," the president said Monday.
newsweek.com
U.S. 'Unprincipled' on Human Rights, NGO Chief Warns
The executive director of Human Rights Watch says that Donald Trump treats human rights legislation as a political tool rather than a matter of principle.
newsweek.com
'He Was Cool as a Cucumber': 9-Year-Old Stumbles Across One of the World's Deadliest Snakes in His Own Backyard
No one was harmed, but the story is wild.
newsweek.com
Trump won’t approve TikTok deal if ByteDance keeps control
President Trump said he will not approve a deal to keep TikTok running in the US if its Chinese parent company remains in control of the popular video-sharing app.
nypost.com
How to guard your social feeds against election misinformation
Doug Chayka for Vox Preparing for misinformation might mean decluttering your feed, or making some suggestions to your friends and family. In this election season, misinformation seems to be everywhere. Concern about the state of the post office and absentee voting has fueled misleading, viral images of collection boxes. Racist conspiracy theorists have brought back birtherism to attack vice presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris. President Donald Trump has continued to spread falsehoods about mail-in voting, hydroxychloroquine, and whether children can get Covid-19. Under increasing pressure over the past four years, social media platforms have begun cracking down on various forms of misinformation. But an array of critics that includes politicians, the public, and activists say these companies’ efforts fall short. It’s still pretty easy to misinformation and conspiracy theories on the web. “I wouldn’t rely too much on social media companies to do this hard work for us,” Sam Rhodes, who studies misinformation at Utah Valley University, told Recode. “They not only are they not up to the task; they don’t really seem that interested in it.” Rhodes added that social media companies seem to take action more often against specific examples of misinformation after they’ve already gone viral and grabbed the media’s attention. Election Day is approaching, and you’ll likely have to use your own judgment to identify misleading or downright false content on social media. So how can you prepare? Plenty of outlets have written guides to spotting misinformation on your feeds — some great resources are available at The Verge, Factcheck.org, and the Toronto Public Library. You can go beyond that by minimizing the chance that you’ll come across misinformation in the first place (though there’s no guarantee). That means: unfollowing less-than-ideal sources and taking steps to prioritize legitimate ones. It also means talking to friends or family whose feeds might be more vulnerable to misinformation than yours, so they can take the same steps. Misinformation on your feed can take many forms Links that lead to seemingly-normal-but-not news articles can contain misinformation, but that’s not its only source. A family member might share misinformation as a status update or through a text message. It could also come from a discussion in a private online group or in the form of an image or meme. Importantly, misinformation can switch from platform to platform, from format to format, and can jump from obscure sites into the mainstream discourse relatively quickly. And yes, misinformation can appear in political advertisements, as well as posts from the president of the United States. In July, President Donald Trump hinted at delaying the election, which he does not have the legal capacity to do, among sharing other mail-in ballot misinformation. But much of this misinformation won’t be deleted because social media companies don’t usually consider inaccurate information to be enough of a reason to remove a post. While Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube might remove a post if it could cause physical harm or interfere in an election, the platforms generally don’t ban misinformation itself. Facebook, at least, does some automatic labeling of posts that appear to be about voting information, pointing readers to vetted sources. Social media companies also have broader fact-checking programs, but these are hardly a cure-all when it comes to preventing the spread of misinformation. Fact-checkers can’t easily find content that’s shared in private groups and messages, and the tools fact-checkers have to flag misinformation are limited. The purpose of Facebook’s fact-checkers, for instance, is to apply labels to — and reduce the spread of — misinformation; factchecking doesn’t itself lead to the content being taken down. And they don't label everything. A recent report from the activist nonprofit Avaaz found that just 16 percent of health misinformation on Facebook analyzed by its researchers carried a warning from fact-checkers. And Facebook has also removed fact-checking labels in response to pressure from conservative groups. In Facebook groups, users might also encounter unfounded conspiracy theories. Here’s what one such post in a 5G conspiracy theory group that Recode wrote about earlier this year looks like. Here’s what you can do to limit your own exposure to misinformation Your social feeds are most shaped by who you follow, so following reputable sources of information and news is probably your best bet. Unfollowing known sources of misinformation, even if that includes close friends and family, is probably worth considering as well. If you want to get ahead on fact-checking, you might consider following factchecking organizations directly, ensuring their fact-checks are in your feed. You can check out this list of organizations that have signed on to the fact-checking principles established by the International Factchecking Network, or this list of US-focused fact-checkers from American University. There are also media-trust tools, which can help flag known disreputable sources. NewsGuard, for instance, provides resources for tracking particular sources of misinformation on the web. Something to watch out for: If you keep seeing the same claim from a bunch of different sources that generally support your political views, you should stay alert. According to Princeton political science professor Andy Guess, “That is when your alarm bells should be going off.” Why? If information supports our side, we’re more likely to believe it and less likely to think critically about it. Repetition also makes us more likely to believe something is true. “One of the real dangers of social media is that there could be one news report or one claim that gets retweeted a bunch and trickles down to people’s feeds, in ways that obscure that this all came from a single source,” Guess told Recode. “So when you see it multiplied, that can make you falsely confident that something is true.” With all that in mind, the platforms do give you tools to help manage your feeds and prime them for accurate information. Facebook Let’s start with Facebook. One of the first things users can do is set your account to prioritize 30 reputable sources — meaning trusted news organizations and fact-checking outlets — in your News Feed. This will make them more likely to appear high up in your feed when you log on. And, of course, you can unfollow or block pages if you spot them sharing misinformation. If that’s too aggressive for you, there are also other tools that allow you to hide and “snooze” bad sources — a strategy that Rhodes, from Utah Valley University, recommends for family members that repeatedly share misinformation. Facebook On Facebook, users can select to see content from some accounts first. It’s important to remember that Facebook in 2018 shifted its algorithm to prioritize posts from friends and family over public content in the News Feed, which means that if you don’t adjust your settings, a conspiracy-curious Facebook post from your mom might get higher placement into your feed than a reported-out story posted by the Associated Press Facebook page. When you’re scrolling through your News Feed, you can also keep an eye out for the “News Feed Context Button,” which provides extra information for some links and pages that share content on your feed. If an outlet doesn’t come up as having a formal presence on Facebook — and doesn’t have a Wikipedia page — that’s probably a good sign they’re not an established outlet worth trusting. This is an example of how a link to a site known for producing fake news shows up. In addition to its fact-checking and voting information labels, Facebook sometimes offers another label, called interstitials, that are designed to provide more context to a piece of content, mainly emphasizing that an article about Covid-19 is very old and probably out-of-date. If an account keeps sharing out-of-date news headlines, they might be worth unfollowing: Old stories can be misleading and lack critical, new information. If you receive an alert from Facebook that you’ve previously interacted with fake news, it might be worth going back to unfollow that source, too. If you see something flagged as false pop in your page, you can also check out the “Why Am I Seeing This Feature,” which can help find the root of a particular, concerning post. That might show you that you’re in a group where such misinformation is posted, or if your frequent commenting on a particular account is boosting its presence in your feed. This is what the “context” provided about the New Yorker looks like on Facebook. You can also turn off political ads — which can also be a source of misinformation — though you may risk missing ads from lesser-known candidates. If you use the Facebook News App, you can also choose which outlets to prioritize in its settings, or leave what you see up to the platform’s curation. If you run any Facebook groups, it’s worth keeping an eye out for “group quality” notices that the company might display on the pages. That’s where Facebook will tell you whether posts in your group have been flagged for sharing false news. If you’re in a group that keeps posting misinformation, consider leaving that group. Twitter Next up is Twitter. Again, what you see depends largely on who you follow. One way that Twittermakes controlling who you follow easier is through Lists, which are “curated groups” of accounts, like a list of news or journalism organizations. There’s also the Twitter “Topics” section, which lets you follow topics like the 2020 Election, as well as unfollow topics you’re not interested in and don’t want to hear more about. Twitter also picks up your “interests,” which you can look at and edit here. One thing to keep in mind is that a verified Twitter accounts — these are accounts that carry little white checks in blue circles — is not guaranteed to be an accurate or legitimate source. That said, unverified accounts are probably not an ideal way of finding confirmed, breaking news either. You should also keep an eye out for Twitter’s labels for state- and government-affiliated media sources. Those sources have particular motives of their own and can skew events in a particular way. Of course, not every outlet that might have goals beyond accurate journalism in mind gets a label. If you see a story going viral on Twitter, pay attention to what headline Twitter places in its trending box. Sometimes, the company will choose to elevate content from specific fact-checkers or news organizations that refutes a trending but false narrative. This happened, for instance, when misinformation about Sen. Kamala Harris’ eligibility to run for president went viral. Everywhere else Beyond steps you can take that are specific to a platform, you can apply common sense measures, like watching for sensationalist headlines and avoiding suspicious-looking websites, some of which might be imitating the websites of real news providers. That also means clicking through an article — and looking for evidence — before actually sharing it. RT has a “Russia state-affiliated media” label. “Engage very critically with what you’re reading. Check sources and then check supports, like, who’s being quoted where, where the information is coming from, etc,” Seattle-based librarian and media literacy expert Di Zhang recently told Vox’s Today Explained podcast. “[I]f it contains a claim that it has a secret, the media, the government, big business, whatever doesn’t want you to know about and that they’re the only one who has access to this information, that is a big red flag.” Unfortunately, all these steps may not be enough to keep misinformation completely off your feed, especially when the president is spreading misinformation with near-impunity. But here’s some good news: Most people aren’t seeing outright misinformation on their feeds on a regular basis, which means that the best use for this guidance may be sending it a loved one. “The kinds of people who frequently encounter online misinformation tend to be in clusters, where it’s more likely to be shared and viewed,” Guess, the Princeton professor, told Recode. “There are groups of people who read a lot of it, but it’s not most people.” He added that when people share misinformation, they often doing so to signal their membership with particular, highly-partisan groups. Guess also said that those who are sharing misinformation are more likely to be older and to people who tend to mostly read right-wing sources of information, according to his research. So if you’re not personally seeing a lot of misinformation on your feed — but are close to someone who is — you might be in a better position to gently guide them toward better sources of news. But don’t scold them. That can actually strengthen wrong beliefs. “Appeal to their reason, and also appear to appeal to their sensibilities,” said Rhodes, who recommends a script like this: “Like you, I am concerned about the election. Like you, I am concerned about the direction of this country. However, there are others sources out there that may dispute some of the facts and dispute some of the stuff that you’re talking about.” Open Sourced is made possible by Omidyar Network. All Open Sourced content is editorially independent and produced by our journalists. Will you help keep Vox free for all? The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.
vox.com
Nebraska Man Charged in Black Protester’s Death Dies by Suicide
Jacob Gardner was found dead Sunday outside a medical clinic in Oregon, the Hillsboro Police Department said
time.com
Tropical Storm Beta Path, Tracker as Texas Due Heavy Rainfall and Flooding
Voluntary evacuation orders are in place in parts of Texas as Gov. Greg Abbott urges Texans to: "take the necessary precautions to keep themselves and their loved ones out of harm's way."
newsweek.com
Teddi Mellencamp is getting axed from ‘RHOBH’ after three seasons
There's nothing to expect now that she's not expecting.
nypost.com
Wildfires have devastated my city. They'll only get worse unless we force businesses to change
Last week, the window in my San Francisco home office, which is normally so bright that the shade is pulled down, was dark all day. The sun never shone over the city, where I am sheltering in place.
edition.cnn.com
Trump rips China after Post exclusive on COVID-19 outbreak cover-up
President Trump said he expresses his anger whenever he speaks about Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Beijing’s failure to contain the coronavirus pandemic and allowing it to spread about the world, killing nearly 200,000 Americans. The president was asked about a New York Post exclusive report on findings from the House Foreign Affairs Committee that...
nypost.com
NYSE honors RBG with moment of silence
The New York Stock Exchange held a minute of silence in honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Monday. Ginsburg died of complications from metastatic pancreatic cancer Friday at the age of 87. (Sept. 21)       
usatoday.com
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's civil rights legacy remembered
The nation mourns the loss of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an icon of the Supreme Court and one of the fiercest champions for civil rights ever to occupy a position within the nation's highest court. Paula Reid reports.
cbsnews.com
Indonesian official orders coronavirus victims' graves be dug by people busted without masks
Eight people who allegedly were caught not wearing masks in Indonesia must dig graves meant for people who died from novel coronavirus as punishment.
foxnews.com
Untangling Webs of Fear: Therapy Tarantula Treats People with Arachnophobia
Anna is a therapist—and a curly-haired tarantula, officially on the books of Hellabrunn Zoo in Munich, Germany as Tliltocatl albopilosus. Zoo visitors who are terrified of spiders can seek healing in Ursula Riedinger's one-day seminar.
newsweek.com
Yes, Russia is interfering in the 2020 election
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin during a video conference meeting at his suburban Novo-Ogaryovo residence, on August 20, 2020. | Alexei Nikolsky\TASS via Getty Images It wants to cause chaos, again. But it’s also learned some lessons from 2016. There’s an editor’s note at the top of a recent post on Larry Krakow’s blog. “Note to my readers: I had this piece published elsewhere and it is no longer online,” it says at the top of his article, titled “The Hidden Corruption of the CARES Act.” “Sadly, it was a victim of a form of censorship that we can discuss at a later date. For now, understand how important it is to protect the right to free speech and a free press.” The “elsewhere” it was originally published was a little-known website called PeaceData, an upstart progressive global news site, purportedly based primarily in Romania, with a mission “to shed light on the global issues and raise awareness about corruption, environmental crisis, abuse of power, armed conflicts, activism, and human rights.” Krakow, a 48-year-old butcher from Queens in New York, had recently started his own blog as he recovered from Covid-19. Spend five days in hell, with a fever bouncing between 103 and 104 degrees, and a minute passed out on the bathroom floor, and you find you have some things to say. As Krakow set out to promote his own writing, he came across PeaceData. This spring he reached out to Jake Sullivan, who identified himself as the site’s editor-in-chief. “‘Great site — kudos, I’m a fellow blogger, here’s my blog,’ Krakow said he told him. “And they got back to me and they said, ‘Wow, this is the kind of content that we’re looking for.’” “Next thing you know,” he added, “we were doing email exchanges and I was started writing for them.” But PeaceData wasn’t quite what it advertised itself to be. On September 1, Facebook and Twitter announced that, acting on a tip from the FBI, they had taken down a network of accounts connected to PeaceData. The accounts, according to social media companies, were linked to the Internet Research Agency (IRA), the notorious Russian troll farm that played a role in the Russian government’s 2016 election interference operation. (Peacedata, meanwhile, claims they were shut down by “corrupt forces” attempting to silence free speech, including the FBI, the NSA, CNN, and the New York Times.) “Looking back on it, there are definitely some red flags that I noticed,” Jack Delaney, another freelancer who’d been unwittingly recruited to write for the site, told me. For instance, a profile picture for Alex Lacusta, the PeaceData editor Delaney worked with, also looked sort of similar to another editor for the site, Albert Popescu. Their social media accounts were also made pretty recently. And there were some odd grammatical errors in emails Delaney got from Lacusta. According to a report from research firm Graphika, the profile pictures of Lacusta and Popescu — the editors Delaney thought looked a little bit too alike — were avatars generated by artificial intelligence. “At the time,” Delaney told me, “I just chalked it up to coincidence, or you know — that this was a young organization that was maybe a little sloppier and more disorganized than other places I’ve worked with.” Delaney is still trying to wrap his head around the whole thing. It’s not a good feeling, certainly, to find out you were working for a Russian-linked operation. Yet he bristles at the framing that Peacedata was spreading misinformation. “I wasn’t writing stuff I didn’t believe in. I was writing stuff I believed in,” Delaney said. “And, you know, I think, broadly, it was more of attack — or is more meant to discredit independent media, critical independent media, left media.” Krakow, too, is skeptical. He worries that the shutting down of PeaceData is also an attempt to shut down writers and thinkers like him. “I don’t think you can be ambiguous about free speech,” he said. “You cannot, because the biggest threat to freedom is when that freedom to speak your mind is taken away. Because then who becomes the arbiter of content? The state does.” Discrediting democratic institutions, including free speech and freedom of the press, is all part of Russia’s election interference playbook. Yet PeaceData offers an intriguing glimpse into how Russian election meddling is evolving. The trolls and bots of 2016 are being replaced by outsourced writers, including in this case, Americans. Obviously, fake news is being swapped out for articles with a particular slant or point of view. Those are innocuous on their own, but become less so as they find an audience and filter through the online ecosystem. People read, and furiously reshare, their blood pressure spiking over what the corrupt politicians on the other side are up to now. The stories migrate to more Facebook groups or more extreme websites — Delaney himself said he found one of his articles on a site known for spreading pro-Russia propaganda — or Facebook groups, placed alongside more overt propaganda. Now, that article is a weapon. What makes this so dangerous isn’t that it’s particularly skillful. It’s that America, right now, is primed for it. The country’s hardened partisan divides, growing distrust in expertise, and distinct media silos are chipping away at a functioning democracy. Russia is taking advantage of what the United States has already created. “When there are cracks in the edifice, then it’s easier to break things,” Glenn Carle, a former CIA officer and national security expert, told me. “And so the Russians will build on that.” Russia is not squandering this opportunity. The US Office of the Director of National Intelligence said in August that Moscow “is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia ‘establishment.’” Last week, FBI Director Christopher Wray said that “we have seen very active — very active — efforts by the Russians to influence our election in 2020,” adding that, as the intelligence community assessed, those efforts are focused on denigrating Biden. The Kremlin is also using pro-Russian Ukrainians to try to spread misleading information about Biden, some of which has been amplified by the president and his allies. Russian government hackers have also targeted at least 200 groups tied to US elections, according to a recent report from Microsoft. Intelligence officials have also suggested China and Iran are interfering in US politics, but there are questions about whether their activities rival Russia’s — Democrats say no — and experts say their aims are different. Even more worrying, a recent Department of Homeland Security whistleblower has accused the Trump administration of purposely downplaying the Russia threat because of Trump’s discomfort with it. There’s a lot we don’t know publicly about Russia’s activities, but what we do know, and can see online, shows that Moscow is taking advantage of a bitter and divisive election year. A recap of what Russia did in 2016 Russia’s goal is to create chaos. That was true in 2016, and it’s true now. “Their first goal is disruption,” James Andrew Lewis, director of the Technology and Public Policy Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, told me. “They’re doing really well.” The chaos has a point: Russia wants to create confusion and distrust. This undermines faith in American institutions and hampers their ability to function. It increases disillusionment in American democracy, boosting the sense that the system is rigged and isn’t serving the people. This makes the US government a less effective actor at home and abroad. Russia executed this campaign in 2016 by ratcheting up tensions online, and by using government hackers to steal materials and then leak them to distract and divide. The Internet Research Agency, a St. Petersburg-based “troll farm,” posted politically charged content, and bought ads that elevated those issues on social media sites. Operatives posing as US-based activists or entities created social media pages to exploit ideological and racial fissures, and some of these accounts were amplified by US figures. Sometimes activities spilled offline, too, with trolls organizing protests and counterprotests. Special counsel Robert Mueller examined the activities of the Internet Research Agency as part his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 elections, and so did a Republican-led Senate committee. Mueller’s team indicted 12 Russian nationalswho allegedly worked for the IRA, and another, Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin, known as “Putin’s chef,” whom prosecutors allege funded the operation. (Mueller did not find any evidence that Americans coordinated or conspired with the IRA.) Hackers tied to Russian military intelligence (known as the GRU) also infiltrated the computer networks of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). They stole internal emails and other documents, which they then published online, first through fake personas and then through WikiLeaks. The first big document dump came in July 2016, right before the start of the Democratic Convention, and attempted to create disunity among Democrats. GRU-linked operatives also targeted Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta, and released his emails. That document dump came on October 7, 2016, the same day Donald Trump’s Access Hollywood tape became public. The Senate committee also found that Russia hacked into voter and registration databases and state election infrastructure in all 50 states in 2016. There’s no evidence any votes were changed, though in some instances, including in Illinois, the committee found that Russia could have deleted or changed voter data if it wanted to. Mueller’s team investigated the ties between Trump campaign officials and Russia. Mueller and a sweeping Senate investigation both documented numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians linked to the Kremlin, but ultimately did not find evidence of conspiracy or coordination. Yet the Russia investigation, and Trump’s assault on it, helped transform a foreign adversary’s attack on US elections into a partisan issue, and has muddled the core fact that both Republicans and Democrats initially agreed on: that Russia meddled in the 2016 election and had designs on 2018, 2020, and beyond. That’s a victory that perhaps Russia couldn’t have initially dreamed of — that their attack on the US would also become a topic that is still tearing the US apart. But Russia did interfere in the 2016 US election. And, really, it’s been interfering ever since. “For them, this isn’t episodic,” Lewis said. “Sometimes Americans have trouble realizing that — certainly for the Russians — they think we’re in a fight and it’s ongoing. And it’s persistent.” America is already doing a lot of Russia’s work for it this time around Russian disinformation aims to wear down its consumers, to get them to question what’s real and what’s not, so they just give up and assume everything is already rigged — the exact opposite of what makes a healthy democracy. The disinformation is also designed to emotionally manipulate, to confirm the biases you already have. The thing is, America is already doing this to itself. One segment of the country knows Russia interfered in 2016; another thinks it’s all a made-up “witch hunt.” One segment of the country believes the election will be stolen by mail-in voter fraud; another has fears the Trump administration may sabotage mail-in voting through the United States Postal Service. One segment of the country is still quarantining; another thinks Covid-19 is a hoax made up to hurt Trump. “Russia doesn’t need to create a lot of the same content that it created in 2016 because it’s being created in the United States, by Americans,” Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation fellow at the Wilson Center and author of How to Lose the Information War: Russia, Fake News, and the Future of Conflict, told me. Russia can amplify what Americans have put out there, just spreading even further the conspiracies and manipulative content made in the US. And America is particularly vulnerable when even the president’s own Twitter account is a major vector for disinformation. Take Trump’s claims that mail-in voting is rife with fraud. (It’s not.) He has accused Democrats of trying to “steal the election” through mail-in voting. He has encouraged voters in North Carolina to vote twice, which is against the law. Twitter has flagged his misleading tweets about voter fraud. Those lies get blasted through pro-Trump media, and filter down to his supporters. Trump has already seeded the idea that if he loses, the US election is rigged. That is also what Russia wants people to believe. Which is why the discussion of voting by mail has become a target for foreign influence, according to a memo from the Department of Homeland Security released in September. “We assess that Russia is likely to continue amplifying criticisms of vote-by-mail and shifting voting processes amidst the COVID-19 pandemic to undermine public trust in the electoral process,” the memo states. In the primaries, Russian state media and proxy websites elevated stories about problems with ballot delivery. In mid-August — just as Trump was increasing his attacks on mail-in voting — Russian state media and proxy websites “criticized the integrity of expanded and universal vote-by-mail, claiming ineligible voters could receive ballots due to out-of-date voter rolls, leaving a vast amount of ballots unaccounted for and vulnerable to tampering.” Again, that’s the same argument being pushed by Trump and, notably, Attorney General William Barr. The Russians are seizing on other charged social and political issues. Moscow has exploited racial politics and police brutality in America since the Cold War, but it’s particularly salient now, given the summer of protests against police brutality. Russian trolls also promote “us versus them” narratives, as Young Mie Kim, an affiliated scholar with the Brennan Center, wrote in March 2020, that target the disillusioned on both the left and the right. And they try to create confusion within coalitions — trying to promote divisions within the Democratic Party, for instance, by attacking Biden for being insufficiently left-wing enough, or trying to play up Sen. Kamala Harris’s criminal justice record. But again, these social and political fissures already exist in the US. Russia just turns up the volume to make the cracks even wider. “Most of the misinformation or the hyper-partisan stories that are out there are successful because we’re all kind of part of the environment in which we would like to believe horrible things about our opponents or people who don’t think like we do,” Priscilla Moriuchi, an expert on state-sponsored cyber operations and fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University, said. How the Russian delivery of misinformation has evolved Russian trolls have refined their techniques, and are avoiding some of the clunkier or spammier stuff they put out around 2016. There’s less outright “fake news” and more slanted or misleading information. The Russians have gotten a lot better at impersonating Americans, more closely mimicking real campaigns or organizations to try to deceive. One example from the Brennan Center: “the IRA mimicked the official account of the Bernie Sanders campaign, “bernie2020,” by using similar names like “bernie.2020__”. They’re starting to copy and paste instead of writing their own content, which also helps avoid some English-language slip ups. The IRA has tried to create real-life events, but it is more aggressively outsourcing its activities to others, whether local actors or other groups abroad. Peacedata is an example of this, enlisting Americans to write content for them. “Russia has really started to shift toward the more surreptitious and kind of more plausibly deniable stuff,” Jankowicztold me. Jankowicz noted that Russian trolls seems to be making better use of Facebook groups, which already are primed for misinformation or even radicalization. “That makes them a prime attack surface for any bad actor, whether that is a foreign disinformer or a domestic disinformer — all you have to do is drop a link into that group,” she said, and people will spread it for you, all on their own. No need to buy an ad. These tactics make foreign actors a little harder to detect in our messy online ecosystem, and maybe more dangerous. If the articles are written by real, unwitting Americans, if they’re shared by real Americans in their own Facebook groups, social media companies may be slower to identify and remove foreign propaganda. As much as Americans like to call out Twitter or Facebook accounts for being “Russian bots,” experts told me social media companies have gotten pretty good at cracking down on those. But even as these accounts get taken down, new ones tend to spring up in their place. “If they found out that you were going into the front window, then you go through the cellar,” Carle, the national security expert, said. “But you’d never ever stop. Why would you?” How a conspiracy theory embraced by Trump keeps spiraling A useful example of how Russia’s election meddling has continued to evolve since 2016 is the case of Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Ukraine. Around this time last year, a whistleblower complaint from an intelligence official accused President Trump of using the “power of his office” to solicit help in the 2020 election from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump had a phone call with the Ukrainian president in which he pressured Zelensky to investigate his then-potential Democratic rival Joe Biden, and he tried to use a White House meeting and military aid as leverage to induce Zelensky to cooperate. That whistleblower complaint ultimately resulted in Trump being impeached by the House, though the Senate acquitted him. But defenders of the president also latched onto the storyline that had sparked Trump’s inappropriate pressure campaign in the first place. The allegation goes something like this: Joe Biden, when he was vice president, pushed the Ukrainian government to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma — a company his son, Hunter, sat on the board of. The implication is that Biden inappropriately used his powers of office to protect his son from potential legal or financial trouble. The reality is that Biden was acting squarely within the stated foreign policy of the US and its European allies, who felt the Ukrainian prosecutor in question wasn’t doing enoughto clean up corruption. The push to get the prosecutor fired was supported at the time by both Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Yet Trump allies have continued to pursue this thread. Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani — also involved in the impeachment scandal — has continued to travel to Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden, and has pushed the Biden-corruption conspiracy theory on pro-Trump networks. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is also conducting an official Senate investigation into Biden’s dealings in Ukraine. What’s helped the conspiracy along is the work of a Ukrainian politician with ties to Russian intelligence, Andriy Derkach. Giuliani personally met with the politician, Andriy Derkach, last year. And in May, Derkach released edited audio tapes of private phone calls between Biden and Ukraine’s then-President Petro Poroshenko in which the two discuss, among other things, the ousting of the Ukrainian prosecutor. There are doubts about the origins of the calls, and how much they are edited, but even then, they don’t provide much ammunition for the accusations against Biden that he intervened to protect his son. But that doesn’t really matter.They are thriving on right-wing media sites. Trump associates including Donald Trump, Jr. have promoted the tapes, and Trump has retweeted the audio. Then, earlier this month, the US Treasury sanctioned Derkach for interfering in the 2020 election. “Derkach, a Member of the Ukrainian Parliament, has been an active Russian agent for over a decade, maintaining close connections with the Russian Intelligence Services,” Treasury announced. “Derkach has directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in an attempt to undermine the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election.” So, to recap: An alleged Russian agent put out misinformation intended to discredit Joe Biden. To spread that information, he didn’t use Russian bots or fake Facebook accounts. He used real Americans already predisposed to what he was selling — including the president’s own lawyer. (Giuliani has since distanced himself from Derkach.) The misinformation was amplified by conservative media outlets in the US, and was eventually shared on Twitter by the president himself. The information itself didn’t even really support the conspiracy against Biden. It created doubt, and a specter of wrongdoing, essentially blurring fact and fiction. And this still works. But, again, Russia doesn’t need to convince you, it just wants to confuse you. The biggest election threats could still be on the way With just weeks to go before the 2020 election, Americans know a lot more about to what to expect — but are not necessarily more prepared. Most experts I spoke to said it is unlikely that Russia could really swing or hack an entire election. Our election system has vulnerabilities, but Russia can exploit the dysfunction in our electoral system without needing to tamper with the actual results. Their biggest concerns — besides another massive hack-and-dump similar to what happened with WikiLeaks in 2016 — are voter suppression on Election Day, and casting doubt on the outcome, especially if the election is close. Russian-linked accounts targeted voters, including African American and other minority voters, to try to suppress turnout in 2016, and many expect Russia to repeat this again by giving false information about voting locations or methods of voting. That could potentially stop or confuse voters from actually casting a ballot. Voting by mail is absolutely going to be a minefield for misinformation in 2020. The number of Americans voting by mail is expected to double, and that could mean states have an overwhelming number of mail-in ballots to count — which means it’s unlikely that some states will know the final results on election night, or even the day after. This delay — which isn’t really a delay, just due diligence — could give election misinformation the opportunity to fester. US officials have debunked the conspiracy theory that foreign actors are trying to manipulate voting by mail; in fact, voting by mail is more secure as there’s a paper record, and ballots can be more easily verified. Yet Trump has already suggested that vote-by-mail is full of fraud. In this charged environment, the fear is that Russians could advance news items or other misleading claims about fraud or problems at polls. This could stop people from voting at all — or, if the results aren’t favorable to one side or the other, it will be proof that the election was rigged. What happens after that is something we all should worry about. Will you help keep Vox free for all? The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.
vox.com
Diego Mentrida: The act of sportsmanship that made Will Smith cry
Spanish triathlete Diego Mentrida showed the ultimate sportsmanship over the weekend when he gave up a podium finish to his competitor, who went the wrong way on the course mistakenly.
edition.cnn.com
What Makes a City an 'Anarchist Jurisdiction'? New York City, Seattle, Portland Funding Threatened Under Trump Order
Trump ordered the Office of Management and Budget to issue guidance on "restricting [anarchist jurisdiction] eligibility or otherwise disfavoring, to the maximum extent permitted by law," cities from federal grants.
newsweek.com
Hurricane Teddy bringing 'life-threatening' rip currents to East Coast, fall set to arrive
The core of Hurricane Teddy is passing east of Bermuda on Monday, but the large storm will have impacts stretching across the East Coast of the U.S.
foxnews.com
Zendaya fans mistake the meaning of ‘upset’ after historic Emmys 2020 win
The 2020 Emmys offered a teachable moment for Zendaya fans, who were apparently confused by the meaning of “upset.” The 24-year-old’s surprise victory for her portrayal of Rue Bennett in HBO’s “Euphoria” over acting vets Jennifer Aniston, Laura Linney, Olivia Colman, Jodie Comer and Sandra Oh left groupies shocked — over the New York Post’s...
nypost.com
200,000 deaths on President Trump’s watch
Regardless of his attempts to change the narrative, the fact is 200,000 Americans have died from the coronavirus while Trump did his best to minimize the pandemic.
washingtonpost.com
Trump questions Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish about Supreme Court appointment
President Trump pushed back when asked if he was going against Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dying wish by appointing someone before the Nov. election, questioning if she even personally made the alleged remarks. Speaking to Fox News’ Monday morning, the commander-in-chief made the claim while discussing why he was moving forward with a...
nypost.com
Daniel Prude death prompts New York AG to announce new police bodycam policy
New York Attorney General Letitia James announced Sunday that her office will proactively release police body-camera footage in light of Daniel Prude’s fatal encounter with Rochester police officers and the subsequent protests that broke out more than five months later when the video of the incident was finally made public.  
foxnews.com
DOJ identifies NYC, other cities as jurisdictions permitting 'anarchy, violence and destruction'
The Department of Justice (DOJ) on Monday identified New York City, Portland and Washington, D.C., as "local governments that are permitting anarchy, violence, and destruction in American cities," a move that comes as the federal government continues to take a tough stance against localized rioting in some areas of the country. 
foxnews.com
Jennifer Lopez gives us ‘vacation vibes’ in tropical bikini
Fall may technically start on Tuesday, but J.Lo isn't quite ready to bid summer goodbye.
nypost.com
Vietnam Airlines passenger spread coronavirus to 15 on international flight, study claims
It only takes one person to spread a virus.
foxnews.com
Seahawks' Quandre Diggs ejected after helmet hit on Patriots' N’Keal Harry
Seattle Seahawks star safety Quandre Diggs was ejected from Sunday night’s game against the New England Patriots after a scary helmet-to-helmet hit on N’Keal Harry, a play which will likely draw further disciplinary action from the league. 
foxnews.com
Stock market battered: Dow Jones down as banks suffer, economic concerns grip investors
Stocks are falling sharply in early trading on Wall Street Monday, joining a global tumble for markets as the S&P 500 sinks nearly 2%.       
usatoday.com
Bloomberg's $100 Million Coming to Florida With Latino Voters as 'Centerpiece'
Florida Democrats familiar with the plans, which are still being finalized, say Latinos will be a "centerpiece" of the staggering late-stage investment.
newsweek.com
UN facing deeply polarized world on 75th anniversary
UNITED NATIONS — Born out of World War II’s devastation to save succeeding generations from the scourge of conflict, the United Nations officially marks its 75th anniversary Monday at an inflection point in history, navigating a polarized world as it faces a pandemic, regional conflicts, a shrinking economy and growing inequality. Criticized for spewing out...
nypost.com
GOP Congressman Follows up Controversial RBG Tweet by Slamming Amazon's 'Pro-Abortion' Stacey Abrams Documentary
Georgia Congressman Doug Collins claimed Amazon is furthering an "anti-family" agenda by promoting Abrams' film about voter suppression.
newsweek.com
Trump approves Oracle, Walmart deal for TikTok
President Donald Trump gave his blessing to a deal that would give Oracle and Walmart a combined 20% stake in a new company called TikTok Global, but questions around security remain. CNN's Selina Wang reports.
edition.cnn.com
China reportedly uses Hollywood clips to show simulated attack on US base
The Chinese air force propaganda effort has gone Hollywood, according to a report. The military’s publicity team has released an action-packed video of bombers in a simulated attack on a US base using scenes that seem to have been lifted from the 2008 Oscar-winner “The Hurt Locker” and the 1996 action flick “The Rock,” the...
nypost.com
Red squirrel 'plays' grand piano in viral photos
A wildlife photographer in Scotland has captured remarkable images showing a red squirrel reaching out for hazelnuts encased in a miniature grand piano, British news agency SWNS reports.
foxnews.com
America Can't Afford to Wait for a New Supreme Court Justice | Opinion
It is paramount that the Supreme Court not be left with a vacancy in the middle of a pandemic that continues to restrain the religious liberty of millions of Americans and stoke chaos in our streets.
newsweek.com
Beyoncé and Jay-Z spotted out for dinner with Solange
Beyoncé and Jay-Z were spotted having a late-night dinner Saturday with Bey’s sister, Solange, and two friends at Scarpetta in New York.
nypost.com
Psychedelic medicine is going mainstream. Will it be accessible to all?
These substances are being touted as a game-changing intervention for mental health. But it's not clear if their promise will extend beyond an elite few.
washingtonpost.com
Microsoft to acquire publisher of ‘Doom,’ ‘Elder Scrolls,’ ‘Fallout’ for $7.5 billion
The move figures to significantly bolster Microsoft's Game Pass offerings ahead of the Series X console launch this November.
washingtonpost.com
Some Louisville federal buildings close ahead of expected Breonna Taylor announcement
Some federal buildings in downtown Louisville, Kentucky will be closed this week in a move believed to coincide with an expected announcement by Attorney General Daniel Cameron and his office's investigation into the killing of Breonna Taylor.
edition.cnn.com
Suspect arrested after allegedly slashing two people in West Village
An East Harlem man was nabbed for allegedly slashing two people, including a jogger, across the face minutes apart in Manhattan late Sunday, authorities said.
nypost.com
Emmys 2020: How To Stream All The Emmy Winners
Here's where to stream all your comedy favorites like Schitt's Creek, Schitt's Creek, Schitt's Creek, and, of course, Schitt's Creek.
nypost.com
Coronavirus spreads through airborne particles, aerosols, CDC update says
The coronavirus spreads through droplets and small airborne particles suspended in the air and inhaled, per updated guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
foxnews.com
Bobcat Fire in California becomes one of largest in Los Angeles County history, whips up 'smokenado'
A wind-driven wildfire burning in the mountains northeast of Los Angeles has now scorched over 100,000 acres as of Monday, as strong winds even whipped up a "smokenado." 
foxnews.com